DBMF vs. EMB
DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) and EMB (iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by iM Global Partners, while EMB is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the J.P. Morgan EMBI Global Core Index. DBMF is actively managed, while EMB is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DBMF returned 8.69%/yr vs 1.99%/yr for EMB. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. DBMF charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for EMB.
Performance
DBMF vs. EMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBMF achieves a 10.63% return, which is significantly higher than EMB's 2.68% return.
DBMF
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- -0.55%
- YTD
- 10.63%
- 6M
- 10.35%
- 1Y
- 27.45%
- 3Y*
- 9.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.69%
- 10Y*
- —
EMB
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 2.68%
- 6M
- 2.69%
- 1Y
- 11.68%
- 3Y*
- 9.65%
- 5Y*
- 1.99%
- 10Y*
- 3.33%
DBMF vs. EMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 10.63% | 13.85% | 7.24% | -8.94% | 21.61% | 11.49% | 1.80% | 10.51% |
EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 2.68% | 13.85% | 5.54% | 10.62% | -18.63% | -2.23% | 5.42% | 8.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBMF and EMB is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019 | -0.06 |
The correlation between DBMF and EMB shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (5 years) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBMF vs. EMB — Risk / Return Rank
DBMF
EMB
DBMF vs. EMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBMF | EMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.41 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.54 | 2.63 | +1.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.23 | 11.23 | +5.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBMF vs. EMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBMF drawdown since its inception was -20.39%, smaller than the maximum EMB drawdown of -34.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBMF and EMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBMF | EMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.39% | -34.70% | +14.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.10% | -4.51% | -1.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.60% | -7.95% | -7.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.39% | -28.74% | +8.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.59% | 0.00% | -1.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.55% | -5.05% | -1.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.70% | 1.06% | +0.64% |
Volatility
DBMF vs. EMB - Volatility Comparison
iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) has a higher volatility of 2.92% compared to iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) at 1.81%. This indicates that DBMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBMF | EMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.92% | 1.81% | +1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.05% | 4.70% | +5.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.39% | 5.67% | +6.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.53% | 9.75% | +2.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.41% | 9.96% | +2.45% |
DBMF vs. EMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBMF has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than EMB's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBMF vs. EMB - Dividend Comparison
DBMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.17%, more than EMB's 5.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 5.17% | 5.91% | 5.75% | 2.91% | 7.72% | 10.38% | 0.86% | 9.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 5.01% | 4.98% | 5.46% | 4.74% | 5.04% | 3.89% | 3.88% | 4.51% | 5.64% | 4.54% | 4.83% | 4.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBMF and EMB have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBMF has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to EMB (1.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBMF dropped -20.39% vs EMB's -34.70%.
On 5-year performance, DBMF leads with 8.69% vs 1.99% for EMB. On fees, EMB is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, EMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DBMF has performed better with a 8.69% return vs 1.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMB is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBMF.
DBMF has the higher dividend yield at 5.17%, compared with 5.01% for EMB.
DBMF is categorized as Systematic Trend, while EMB is Emerging Markets Bonds. They also come from different issuers: iM Global Partners and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DBMF and 0.39% for EMB.
DBMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBMF and EMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer