DBJP vs. VOO
DBJP (Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBJP is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBJP returned 15.87%/yr vs 15.23%/yr for VOO. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DBJP charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
DBJP vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBJP achieves a 16.67% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 8.45% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DBJP having a 15.87% annualized return and VOO not far behind at 15.23%.
DBJP
- 1D
- -3.50%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 16.67%
- 6M
- 18.37%
- 1Y
- 49.57%
- 3Y*
- 26.98%
- 5Y*
- 20.66%
- 10Y*
- 15.87%
VOO
- 1D
- -2.59%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 8.45%
- 6M
- 8.18%
- 1Y
- 25.87%
- 3Y*
- 21.52%
- 5Y*
- 13.39%
- 10Y*
- 15.23%
DBJP vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF | 16.67% | 29.51% | 25.53% | 36.21% | -4.19% | 13.04% | 10.53% | 20.87% | -14.82% | 21.24% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 8.45% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBJP and VOO is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2011 | 0.63 |
The correlation between DBJP and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
DBJP vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DBJP
VOO
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
DBJP
VOO
Technology
DBJP
VOO
Financial Services
DBJP
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
DBJP
VOO
Communication Services
DBJP
VOO
Healthcare
DBJP
VOO
Consumer Defensive
DBJP
VOO
Basic Materials
DBJP
VOO
Real Estate
DBJP
VOO
Utilities
DBJP
VOO
Energy
DBJP
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBJP vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
DBJP
VOO
DBJP vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBJP | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.39 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.79 | 2.92 | +1.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.63 | 13.53 | +5.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBJP | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.62 | 2.15 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.09 | 0.80 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | 0.85 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.88 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
DBJP vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBJP drawdown since its inception was -31.30%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBJP and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBJP | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.30% | -33.99% | +2.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.39% | -8.90% | -1.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.50% | -18.69% | -2.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.50% | -24.52% | +3.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.30% | -33.99% | +2.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.50% | -2.90% | -0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.29% | -3.69% | -3.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 1.92% | +0.75% |
Volatility
DBJP vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) has a higher volatility of 4.97% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.74%. This indicates that DBJP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBJP | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.97% | 3.74% | +1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.27% | 9.30% | +4.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.02% | 12.10% | +6.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.99% | 16.84% | +2.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.48% | 18.02% | +1.46% |
DBJP vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBJP has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBJP vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
DBJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, more than VOO's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF | 2.41% | 2.81% | 2.80% | 5.21% | 0.80% | 2.30% | 2.53% | 2.56% | 3.87% | 2.07% | 1.13% | 5.95% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBJP and VOO have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBJP has higher volatility (4.97%) compared to VOO (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBJP dropped -31.30% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 10-year performance, DBJP leads with 15.87% vs 15.23% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DBJP has performed better with a 15.87% return vs 15.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DBJP.
DBJP has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 1.05% for VOO.
DBJP is categorized as Japan Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. DBJP tracks MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DBJP and 0.03% for VOO.
DBJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBJP and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer