PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBJP vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBJP vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBJP achieves a 16.67% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 8.45% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DBJP having a 15.87% annualized return and VOO not far behind at 15.23%.


DBJP

1D
-3.50%
1M
1.64%
YTD
16.67%
6M
18.37%
1Y
49.57%
3Y*
26.98%
5Y*
20.66%
10Y*
15.87%

VOO

1D
-2.59%
1M
0.50%
YTD
8.45%
6M
8.18%
1Y
25.87%
3Y*
21.52%
5Y*
13.39%
10Y*
15.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBJP vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBJP
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF
16.67%29.51%25.53%36.21%-4.19%13.04%10.53%20.87%-14.82%21.24%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
8.45%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between DBJP and VOO is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2011

0.63

The correlation between DBJP and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

DBJP vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DBJP
VOO

Industrials

26.0%
8.3%

Technology

19.1%
35.7%

Financial Services

17.5%
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
10.2%

Communication Services

7.9%
11.3%

Healthcare

6.3%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
4.9%

Basic Materials

3.0%
1.8%

Real Estate

2.3%
1.9%

Utilities

1.1%
2.4%

Energy

1.1%
3.5%

Industrials

DBJP
26.0%
VOO
8.3%

Technology

DBJP
19.1%
VOO
35.7%

Financial Services

DBJP
17.5%
VOO
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

DBJP
12.2%
VOO
10.2%

Communication Services

DBJP
7.9%
VOO
11.3%

Healthcare

DBJP
6.3%
VOO
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

DBJP
3.6%
VOO
4.9%

Basic Materials

DBJP
3.0%
VOO
1.8%

Real Estate

DBJP
2.3%
VOO
1.9%

Utilities

DBJP
1.1%
VOO
2.4%

Energy

DBJP
1.1%
VOO
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBJP vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBJP
DBJP Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
DBJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBJP Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
DBJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBJP Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBJP vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBJPVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.39

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.79

2.92

+1.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.63

13.53

+5.10

DBJP vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBJP Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBJP and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBJPVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

2.15

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.09

0.80

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.85

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.88

-0.21

Drawdowns

DBJP vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBJP drawdown since its inception was -31.30%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBJP and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBJPVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.30%

-33.99%

+2.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.39%

-8.90%

-1.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.50%

-18.69%

-2.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.50%

-24.52%

+3.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.30%

-33.99%

+2.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.50%

-2.90%

-0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.29%

-3.69%

-3.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

1.92%

+0.75%

Volatility

DBJP vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) has a higher volatility of 4.97% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.74%. This indicates that DBJP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBJPVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.97%

3.74%

+1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.27%

9.30%

+4.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.02%

12.10%

+6.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.99%

16.84%

+2.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.48%

18.02%

+1.46%

DBJP vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBJP has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBJP vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

DBJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, more than VOO's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBJP
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF
2.41%2.81%2.80%5.21%0.80%2.30%2.53%2.56%3.87%2.07%1.13%5.95%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBJP and VOO have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBJP has higher volatility (4.97%) compared to VOO (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBJP dropped -31.30% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, DBJP leads with 15.87% vs 15.23% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBJP has performed better with a 15.87% return vs 15.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DBJP.

DBJP has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 1.05% for VOO.

DBJP is categorized as Japan Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. DBJP tracks MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DBJP and 0.03% for VOO.

DBJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBJP and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer