DBJP vs. USCA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DBJP (Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF) and USCA (Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBJP is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index, while USCA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Climate Action Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DBJP returned 28.45%/yr vs 18.72%/yr for USCA. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DBJP charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for USCA.

Performance

DBJP vs. USCA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBJP achieves a 21.03% return, which is significantly higher than USCA's 3.65% return.

DBJP

• 1D: -4.33%
• 1M: 3.46%
• YTD: 21.03%
• 6M: 21.10%
• 1Y: 53.92%
• 3Y*: 28.45%
• 5Y*: 21.61%
• 10Y*: 17.47%

USCA

• 1D: -1.13%
• 1M: -1.90%
• YTD: 3.65%
• 6M: 2.68%
• 1Y: 15.74%
• 3Y*: 18.72%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBJP vs. USCA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF	21.03%	29.51%	25.53%	22.70%
USCA Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF	3.65%	14.24%	27.24%	19.92%

Correlation

The correlation between DBJP and USCA is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2023	0.57

The correlation between DBJP and USCA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

DBJP vs. USCA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DBJP	USCA
Industrials	24.5%	6.6%
Technology	21.7%	41.9%
Financial Services	17.0%	8.9%
Consumer Cyclical	11.9%	10.5%
Communication Services	8.9%	12.2%
Healthcare	5.6%	9.0%
Basic Materials	3.4%	1.5%
Consumer Defensive	3.3%	4.0%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.8%
Utilities	1.0%	1.7%
Energy	0.9%	1.9%

Return for Risk

DBJP vs. USCA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBJP

DBJP Risk / Return Rank: 88
DBJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
DBJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
DBJP Omega Ratio Rank: 85
DBJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
DBJP Martin Ratio Rank: 91

USCA

USCA Risk / Return Rank: 36
USCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
USCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
USCA Omega Ratio Rank: 36
USCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
USCA Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBJP vs. USCA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DBJP	USCA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.72	1.25	+1.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.58	1.76	+1.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.23	+0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.22	1.54	+3.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.97	5.91	+14.05

DBJP vs. USCA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBJP Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is higher than the USCA Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBJP and USCA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DBJP vs. USCA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBJP drawdown since its inception was -31.30%, which is greater than USCA's maximum drawdown of -19.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBJP and USCA.

Drawdown Indicators

	DBJP	USCA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.30%	-19.14%	-12.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.39%	-10.25%	-0.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.50%	-19.14%	-2.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.50%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.33%	-3.97%	-0.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.27%	-2.17%	-5.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.71%	2.67%	+0.04%

Volatility

DBJP vs. USCA - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) has a higher volatility of 7.92% compared to Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) at 4.78%. This indicates that DBJP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USCA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DBJP	USCA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.92%	4.78%	+3.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.56%	9.87%	+5.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.90%	12.66%	+7.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.18%	14.85%	+4.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.31%	14.85%	+4.46%

DBJP vs. USCA - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBJP has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than USCA's 0.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

DBJP vs. USCA - Dividend Comparison

DBJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, more than USCA's 1.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF	1.25%	2.81%	2.80%	5.21%	0.80%	2.30%	2.53%	2.56%	3.87%	2.07%	1.13%	5.95%
USCA Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF	1.15%	1.14%	1.22%	1.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DBJP and USCA in my portfolio?

DBJP and USCA have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DBJP or USCA?

DBJP has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to USCA (4.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBJP dropped -31.30% vs USCA's -19.14%.

Which ETF is better, DBJP or USCA?

On 3-year performance, DBJP leads with 28.45% vs 18.72% for USCA. On fees, USCA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, USCA has been the lower-risk option at 4.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DBJP or USCA?

Over the 3-year period, DBJP has performed better with a 28.45% return vs 18.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DBJP or USCA?

USCA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DBJP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DBJP or USCA?

DBJP has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 1.15% for USCA.

What is the main difference between DBJP and USCA?

DBJP is categorized as Japan Equities, while USCA is Large Cap Blend Equities. DBJP tracks MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index, while USCA tracks MSCI USA Climate Action Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DBJP and 0.07% for USCA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.