DBEZ vs. EASG
DBEZ (Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF) and EASG (Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBEZ is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU IMI 100% Hedged to USD Net Variant, while EASG is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DBEZ returned 12.19%/yr vs 7.00%/yr for EASG. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DBEZ charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for EASG.
Performance
DBEZ vs. EASG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBEZ achieves a 12.37% return, which is significantly higher than EASG's 8.27% return.
DBEZ
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- 3.40%
- YTD
- 12.37%
- 6M
- 13.09%
- 1Y
- 25.09%
- 3Y*
- 18.47%
- 5Y*
- 12.19%
- 10Y*
- 12.90%
EASG
- 1D
- -2.10%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 8.27%
- 6M
- 8.01%
- 1Y
- 19.79%
- 3Y*
- 14.10%
- 5Y*
- 7.00%
- 10Y*
- —
DBEZ vs. EASG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEZ Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF | 12.37% | 26.14% | 9.51% | 21.78% | -10.13% | 23.52% | 0.36% | 29.94% | -7.15% |
EASG Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF | 8.27% | 25.19% | 2.26% | 18.80% | -16.94% | 11.36% | 10.73% | 23.66% | -5.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBEZ and EASG is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2018 | 0.85 |
The correlation between DBEZ and EASG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
DBEZ vs. EASG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DBEZ
EASG
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
Financial Services
DBEZ
EASG
Industrials
DBEZ
EASG
Technology
DBEZ
EASG
Consumer Cyclical
DBEZ
EASG
Utilities
DBEZ
EASG
Healthcare
DBEZ
EASG
Consumer Defensive
DBEZ
EASG
Communication Services
DBEZ
EASG
Basic Materials
DBEZ
EASG
Energy
DBEZ
EASG
Real Estate
DBEZ
EASG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBEZ vs. EASG — Risk / Return Rank
DBEZ
EASG
DBEZ vs. EASG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF (DBEZ) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBEZ | EASG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.22 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 1.69 | +0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.04 | 6.26 | +2.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBEZ vs. EASG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBEZ drawdown since its inception was -38.76%, which is greater than EASG's maximum drawdown of -32.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEZ and EASG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBEZ | EASG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.76% | -32.06% | -6.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.03% | -11.74% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.59% | -16.14% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.38% | -31.42% | +8.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.64% | -2.20% | +0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.79% | -6.15% | +0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.78% | 3.17% | -0.39% |
Volatility
DBEZ vs. EASG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF (DBEZ) is 4.98%, while Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) has a volatility of 5.32%. This indicates that DBEZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EASG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBEZ | EASG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.98% | 5.32% | -0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.69% | 13.30% | -0.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.05% | 16.09% | -1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.53% | 16.74% | -0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.14% | 18.37% | -0.23% |
DBEZ vs. EASG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBEZ has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than EASG's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBEZ vs. EASG - Dividend Comparison
DBEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than EASG's 3.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEZ Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF | 1.28% | 4.20% | 0.62% | 1.84% | 1.68% | 1.64% | 1.99% | 2.86% | 2.56% | 2.11% | 3.42% | 4.92% |
EASG Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF | 3.93% | 4.18% | 2.93% | 2.51% | 2.47% | 2.69% | 1.70% | 2.94% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBEZ and EASG have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EASG has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to DBEZ (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEZ dropped -38.76% vs EASG's -32.06%.
On 5-year performance, DBEZ leads with 12.19% vs 7.00% for EASG. On fees, EASG is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, DBEZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DBEZ has performed better with a 12.19% return vs 7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EASG is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for DBEZ.
EASG has the higher dividend yield at 3.93%, compared with 1.28% for DBEZ.
DBEZ is categorized as Europe Equities, while EASG is Foreign Large Cap Equities. DBEZ tracks MSCI EMU IMI 100% Hedged to USD Net Variant, while EASG tracks MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for DBEZ and 0.14% for EASG.
DBEZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBEZ and EASG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer