PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBEZ vs. DBAW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBEZ vs. DBAW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF (DBEZ) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBEZ achieves a 12.37% return, which is significantly lower than DBAW's 16.14% return. Over the past 10 years, DBEZ has outperformed DBAW with an annualized return of 12.90%, while DBAW has yielded a comparatively lower 11.99% annualized return.


DBEZ

1D
-1.34%
1M
3.40%
YTD
12.37%
6M
13.09%
1Y
25.09%
3Y*
18.47%
5Y*
12.19%
10Y*
12.90%

DBAW

1D
-2.70%
1M
2.62%
YTD
16.14%
6M
16.41%
1Y
35.60%
3Y*
21.48%
5Y*
11.25%
10Y*
11.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBEZ vs. DBAW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBEZ
Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF
12.37%26.14%9.51%21.78%-10.13%23.52%0.36%29.94%-10.81%15.62%
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
16.14%26.47%14.35%16.26%-13.35%13.08%7.44%22.96%-10.38%18.79%

Correlation

The correlation between DBEZ and DBAW is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2014

0.87

The correlation between DBEZ and DBAW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

DBEZ vs. DBAW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DBEZ
DBAW

Financial Services

22.6%
23.2%

Industrials

20.2%
14.3%

Technology

15.7%
22.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
7.6%

Utilities

5.8%
2.9%

Healthcare

5.2%
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
5.0%

Communication Services

4.6%
4.9%

Basic Materials

4.2%
6.9%

Energy

3.5%
4.8%

Real Estate

1.1%
1.4%

Financial Services

DBEZ
22.6%
DBAW
23.2%

Industrials

DBEZ
20.2%
DBAW
14.3%

Technology

DBEZ
15.7%
DBAW
22.4%

Consumer Cyclical

DBEZ
7.7%
DBAW
7.6%

Utilities

DBEZ
5.8%
DBAW
2.9%

Healthcare

DBEZ
5.2%
DBAW
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

DBEZ
5.0%
DBAW
5.0%

Communication Services

DBEZ
4.6%
DBAW
4.9%

Basic Materials

DBEZ
4.2%
DBAW
6.9%

Energy

DBEZ
3.5%
DBAW
4.8%

Real Estate

DBEZ
1.1%
DBAW
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBEZ vs. DBAW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBEZ
DBEZ Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
DBEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
DBEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

DBAW
DBAW Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
DBAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBAW Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
DBAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBAW Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBEZ vs. DBAW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF (DBEZ) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBEZDBAWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.49

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

3.98

-1.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.04

16.14

-7.10

DBEZ vs. DBAW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBEZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is lower than the DBAW Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBEZ and DBAW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBEZ vs. DBAW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBEZ drawdown since its inception was -38.76%, which is greater than DBAW's maximum drawdown of -31.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEZ and DBAW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBEZDBAWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.76%

-31.44%

-7.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.03%

-9.00%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.59%

-14.11%

-1.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.38%

-17.87%

-5.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.76%

-31.44%

-7.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

-2.70%

+1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.79%

-4.98%

-0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

2.21%

+0.57%

Volatility

DBEZ vs. DBAW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF (DBEZ) is 4.98%, while Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that DBEZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBAW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBEZDBAWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.98%

6.39%

-1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.69%

12.35%

+0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.05%

14.01%

+1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.53%

13.97%

+2.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.14%

15.21%

+2.93%

DBEZ vs. DBAW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBEZ has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than DBAW's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBEZ vs. DBAW - Dividend Comparison

DBEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than DBAW's 1.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
1.69%3.83%1.70%3.45%8.81%2.05%2.08%2.91%2.93%2.41%1.99%5.74%
DBEZ
Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF
1.28%4.20%0.62%1.84%1.68%1.64%1.99%2.86%2.56%2.11%3.42%4.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBEZ and DBAW have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBAW has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to DBEZ (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEZ dropped -38.76% vs DBAW's -31.44%.

On 10-year performance, DBEZ leads with 12.90% vs 11.99% for DBAW. On fees, DBAW is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, DBEZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBEZ has performed better with a 12.90% return vs 11.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBAW is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for DBEZ.

DBAW has the higher dividend yield at 1.69%, compared with 1.28% for DBEZ.

DBEZ is categorized as Europe Equities, while DBAW is Foreign Large Cap Equities. DBEZ tracks MSCI EMU IMI 100% Hedged to USD Net Variant, while DBAW tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA US Dollar Hedged Index. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for DBEZ and 0.41% for DBAW.

DBAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBEZ and DBAW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer