DBEZ vs. ASHS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DBEZ (Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF) and ASHS (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBEZ is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU IMI 100% Hedged to USD Net Variant, while ASHS is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBEZ returned 11.73%/yr vs 3.27%/yr for ASHS. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBEZ charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ASHS.

Performance

DBEZ vs. ASHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF (DBEZ) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBEZ achieves a 9.52% return, which is significantly lower than ASHS's 15.10% return. Over the past 10 years, DBEZ has outperformed ASHS with an annualized return of 11.73%, while ASHS has yielded a comparatively lower 3.27% annualized return.

DBEZ

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: 5.81%
• YTD: 9.52%
• 6M: 11.46%
• 1Y: 18.85%
• 3Y*: 16.73%
• 5Y*: 11.78%
• 10Y*: 11.73%

ASHS

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: -0.19%
• YTD: 15.10%
• 6M: 23.90%
• 1Y: 57.65%
• 3Y*: 13.41%
• 5Y*: 3.97%
• 10Y*: 3.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBEZ vs. ASHS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DBEZ Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF	9.52%	26.14%	9.51%	21.78%	-10.13%	23.52%	0.36%	29.94%	-10.81%	15.62%
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF	15.10%	39.48%	2.68%	-10.03%	-24.78%	17.66%	28.22%	24.53%	-35.91%	7.90%

Correlation

The correlation between DBEZ and ASHS is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2014	0.32

DBEZ vs. ASHS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DBEZ	ASHS
Financial Services	23.1%	6.3%
Industrials	21.9%	19.7%
Technology	14.2%	29.8%
Consumer Cyclical	8.7%	5.8%
Utilities	6.6%	2.2%
Healthcare	5.7%	7.2%
Consumer Defensive	5.3%	2.6%
Basic Materials	4.6%	19.4%
Energy	4.4%	3.2%
Communication Services	4.0%	3.2%
Real Estate	1.4%	0.7%

Return for Risk

DBEZ vs. ASHS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBEZ

DBEZ Risk / Return Rank: 37
DBEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
DBEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
DBEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 36
DBEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
DBEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 42

ASHS

ASHS Risk / Return Rank: 74
ASHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
ASHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
ASHS Omega Ratio Rank: 70
ASHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
ASHS Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBEZ vs. ASHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF (DBEZ) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DBEZ	ASHS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	2.57	-1.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	3.27	-1.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.42	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.72	4.13	-2.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.67	13.72	-7.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DBEZ vs. ASHS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBEZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the ASHS Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBEZ and ASHS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DBEZ	ASHS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.30	2.57	-1.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	0.15	+0.57
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	0.13	+0.51
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	0.19	+0.40

Drawdowns

DBEZ vs. ASHS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBEZ drawdown since its inception was -38.76%, smaller than the maximum ASHS drawdown of -69.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEZ and ASHS.

Drawdown Indicators

	DBEZ	ASHS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.76%	-69.90%	+31.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.03%	-14.03%	+3.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.59%	-34.13%	+18.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.38%	-47.81%	+24.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.76%	-47.81%	+9.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.83%	-33.57%	+32.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.81%	-48.57%	+42.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.83%	4.21%	-1.38%

Volatility

DBEZ vs. ASHS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF (DBEZ) is 5.60%, while Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) has a volatility of 7.33%. This indicates that DBEZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DBEZ	ASHS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.60%	7.33%	-1.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.02%	17.00%	-4.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.57%	22.59%	-8.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.43%	26.46%	-10.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.36%	25.57%	-7.21%

DBEZ vs. ASHS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBEZ has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than ASHS's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

DBEZ vs. ASHS - Dividend Comparison

DBEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, while ASHS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.69%	0.65%	1.90%	0.76%	0.43%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	8.34%
DBEZ Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Equity ETF	3.84%	4.20%	0.62%	1.84%	1.68%	1.64%	1.99%	2.86%	2.56%	2.11%	3.42%	4.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DBEZ and ASHS in my portfolio?

DBEZ and ASHS have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DBEZ or ASHS?

ASHS has higher volatility (7.33%) compared to DBEZ (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEZ dropped -38.76% vs ASHS's -69.90%.

Which ETF is better, DBEZ or ASHS?

On 10-year performance, DBEZ leads with 11.73% vs 3.27% for ASHS. On fees, DBEZ is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, DBEZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DBEZ or ASHS?

Over the 10-year period, DBEZ has performed better with a 11.73% return vs 3.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DBEZ or ASHS?

DBEZ is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ASHS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DBEZ or ASHS?

DBEZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.84%, compared with 0.00% for ASHS.

What is the main difference between DBEZ and ASHS?

DBEZ is categorized as Europe Equities, while ASHS is China Equities. DBEZ tracks MSCI EMU IMI 100% Hedged to USD Net Variant, while ASHS tracks CSI 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for DBEZ and 0.65% for ASHS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.