DBEM vs. USSG
DBEM (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF) and USSG (Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM US Dollar Hedged Index, while USSG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA ESG Leaders. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DBEM returned 9.17%/yr vs 13.10%/yr for USSG. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DBEM charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for USSG.
Performance
DBEM vs. USSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBEM achieves a 27.92% return, which is significantly higher than USSG's 7.41% return.
DBEM
- 1D
- -5.21%
- 1M
- 2.97%
- YTD
- 27.92%
- 6M
- 28.44%
- 1Y
- 54.61%
- 3Y*
- 24.78%
- 5Y*
- 9.17%
- 10Y*
- 10.69%
USSG
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- -1.40%
- YTD
- 7.41%
- 6M
- 6.03%
- 1Y
- 24.41%
- 3Y*
- 21.01%
- 5Y*
- 13.10%
- 10Y*
- —
DBEM vs. USSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEM Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF | 27.92% | 30.42% | 10.61% | 10.53% | -17.00% | -2.26% | 18.12% | 8.12% |
USSG Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF | 7.41% | 18.97% | 23.45% | 29.17% | -20.33% | 31.83% | 18.71% | 19.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBEM and USSG is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2019 | 0.64 |
The correlation between DBEM and USSG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
DBEM vs. USSG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DBEM
USSG
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
DBEM
USSG
Financial Services
DBEM
USSG
Consumer Cyclical
DBEM
USSG
Industrials
DBEM
USSG
Communication Services
DBEM
USSG
Basic Materials
DBEM
USSG
Energy
DBEM
USSG
Consumer Defensive
DBEM
USSG
Healthcare
DBEM
USSG
Utilities
DBEM
USSG
Real Estate
DBEM
USSG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBEM vs. USSG — Risk / Return Rank
DBEM
USSG
DBEM vs. USSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) and Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBEM | USSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.32 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.22 | 2.19 | +3.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.15 | 9.23 | +9.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBEM vs. USSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBEM drawdown since its inception was -33.51%, roughly equal to the maximum USSG drawdown of -34.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEM and USSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBEM | USSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.51% | -34.10% | +0.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.51% | -11.20% | +0.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.12% | -20.00% | +4.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.48% | -27.00% | -3.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.21% | -3.10% | -2.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.66% | -5.57% | -6.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.86% | 2.65% | +0.21% |
Volatility
DBEM vs. USSG - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) has a higher volatility of 11.58% compared to Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG) at 5.30%. This indicates that DBEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBEM | USSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.58% | 5.30% | +6.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.66% | 10.95% | +7.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.69% | 13.73% | +6.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.70% | 17.70% | 0.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.39% | 20.17% | -2.78% |
DBEM vs. USSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBEM has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than USSG's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBEM vs. USSG - Dividend Comparison
DBEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, more than USSG's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEM Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF | 2.06% | 1.84% | 2.48% | 2.55% | 2.65% | 1.77% | 1.74% | 2.59% | 2.85% | 1.51% | 1.59% | 3.49% |
USSG Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF | 1.01% | 1.02% | 1.13% | 1.60% | 1.52% | 1.13% | 1.42% | 1.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBEM and USSG have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBEM has higher volatility (11.58%) compared to USSG (5.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEM dropped -33.51% vs USSG's -34.10%.
On 5-year performance, USSG leads with 13.10% vs 9.17% for DBEM. On fees, USSG is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, USSG has been the lower-risk option at 5.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USSG has performed better with a 13.10% return vs 9.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USSG is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for DBEM.
DBEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.06%, compared with 1.01% for USSG.
DBEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while USSG is Large Cap Growth Equities. DBEM tracks MSCI EM US Dollar Hedged Index, while USSG tracks MSCI USA ESG Leaders. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for DBEM and 0.10% for USSG.
DBEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBEM and USSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer