DBEM vs. IBIC
DBEM (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM US Dollar Hedged Index, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DBEM returned 39.42% vs 4.12% for IBIC. Their -0.04 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. DBEM charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.
Performance
DBEM vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBEM achieves a 20.05% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.67% return.
DBEM
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -3.76%
- 6M
- 10.83%
- YTD
- 20.05%
- 1Y
- 39.42%
- 3Y*
- 20.50%
- 5Y*
- 8.67%
- 10Y*
- 9.11%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.23%
IBIC
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- 6M
- 2.43%
- YTD
- 2.67%
- 1Y
- 4.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.25%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $211.10K | $775.94K | $508.07K | |
| $1.04M | $841.31K | $530.52K |
DBEM vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEM Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF | 20.05% | 30.42% | 10.61% | 3.15% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 2.67% | 4.96% | 5.25% | 2.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBEM and IBIC is -0.22, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023 | -0.04 |
The correlation between DBEM and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to -0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBEM vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank
DBEM
IBIC
DBEM vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBEM | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 2.12 | -0.79 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 15.46 | -12.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.56 | 52.95 | -43.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBEM vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBEM drawdown since its inception was -33.51%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEM and IBIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBEM | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.51% | -0.90% | -32.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.90% | -0.27% | -14.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.04% | -0.08% | -10.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.64% | -0.10% | -11.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.14% | 0.08% | +4.06% |
Volatility
DBEM vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) has a higher volatility of 8.57% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.23%. This indicates that DBEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBEM | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.57% | 0.23% | +8.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.29% | 0.69% | +19.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.38% | 0.89% | +21.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.97% | 1.54% | +16.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.57% | 1.54% | +16.03% |
DBEM vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBEM has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBEM vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison
DBEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, less than IBIC's 4.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEM Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF | 2.20% | 1.84% | 2.48% | 2.55% | 2.65% | 1.77% | 1.74% | 2.59% | 2.85% | 1.51% | 1.59% | 3.49% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 4.62% | 4.43% | 4.65% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBEM and IBIC have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBEM has higher volatility (8.57%) compared to IBIC (0.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEM dropped -33.51% vs IBIC's -0.90%.
On 1-year performance, DBEM leads with 39.42% vs 4.12% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DBEM has performed better with a 39.42% return vs 4.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for DBEM.
IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 2.20% for DBEM.
DBEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. DBEM tracks MSCI EM US Dollar Hedged Index, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for DBEM and 0.10% for IBIC.
IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.67 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBEM and IBIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer