DBEF vs. QTR
DBEF (Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF) and QTR (Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBEF is a Hedge Fund fund tracking the MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index, while QTR is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DBEF returned 17.72%/yr vs 22.93%/yr for QTR. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DBEF charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QTR.
Performance
DBEF vs. QTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBEF achieves a 10.25% return, which is significantly lower than QTR's 17.64% return.
DBEF
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 4.76%
- YTD
- 10.25%
- 6M
- 12.54%
- 1Y
- 24.51%
- 3Y*
- 17.72%
- 5Y*
- 13.11%
- 10Y*
- 12.12%
QTR
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 10.52%
- YTD
- 17.64%
- 6M
- 15.72%
- 1Y
- 33.76%
- 3Y*
- 22.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBEF vs. QTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 10.25% | 23.16% | 13.40% | 20.15% | -5.13% | 3.44% |
QTR Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF | 17.64% | 14.52% | 21.46% | 45.53% | -29.94% | 4.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBEF and QTR is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021 | 0.61 |
The correlation between DBEF and QTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
DBEF vs. QTR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DBEF
QTR
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
DBEF
QTR
Industrials
DBEF
QTR
Healthcare
DBEF
QTR
Technology
DBEF
QTR
Consumer Cyclical
DBEF
QTR
Consumer Defensive
DBEF
QTR
Basic Materials
DBEF
QTR
Communication Services
DBEF
QTR
Energy
DBEF
QTR
Utilities
DBEF
QTR
Real Estate
DBEF
QTR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBEF vs. QTR — Risk / Return Rank
DBEF
QTR
DBEF vs. QTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBEF | QTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.41 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | 2.76 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.01 | 9.47 | +1.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBEF | QTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 2.40 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.68 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
DBEF vs. QTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBEF drawdown since its inception was -32.46%, roughly equal to the maximum QTR drawdown of -31.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEF and QTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBEF | QTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.46% | -31.72% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.41% | -12.29% | +2.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.62% | -18.99% | +4.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.47% | -0.24% | -0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.74% | -8.84% | +4.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 3.57% | -1.34% |
Volatility
DBEF vs. QTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) is 3.99%, while Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) has a volatility of 4.52%. This indicates that DBEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBEF | QTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.99% | 4.52% | -0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.14% | 10.68% | -0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.37% | 14.14% | -1.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.74% | 18.10% | -4.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.79% | 18.10% | -2.31% |
DBEF vs. QTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBEF has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than QTR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBEF vs. QTR - Dividend Comparison
DBEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, less than QTR's 15.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 5.03% | 5.55% | 1.29% | 4.46% | 15.85% | 2.28% | 2.41% | 3.03% | 3.22% | 2.98% | 2.55% | 3.70% |
QTR Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF | 15.96% | 18.77% | 0.50% | 0.53% | 0.36% | 1.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBEF and QTR have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QTR has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to DBEF (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEF dropped -32.46% vs QTR's -31.72%.
On 3-year performance, QTR leads with 22.93% vs 17.72% for DBEF. On fees, DBEF is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, DBEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QTR has performed better with a 22.93% return vs 17.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBEF is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QTR.
QTR has the higher dividend yield at 15.96%, compared with 5.03% for DBEF.
DBEF is categorized as Hedge Fund, while QTR is Nasdaq-100. DBEF tracks MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index, while QTR tracks NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for DBEF and 0.60% for QTR.
QTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBEF and QTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer