PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBEF vs. QTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBEF vs. QTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBEF achieves a 10.25% return, which is significantly lower than QTR's 17.64% return.


DBEF

1D
-0.47%
1M
4.76%
YTD
10.25%
6M
12.54%
1Y
24.51%
3Y*
17.72%
5Y*
13.11%
10Y*
12.12%

QTR

1D
-0.24%
1M
10.52%
YTD
17.64%
6M
15.72%
1Y
33.76%
3Y*
22.93%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBEF vs. QTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DBEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF
10.25%23.16%13.40%20.15%-5.13%3.44%
QTR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF
17.64%14.52%21.46%45.53%-29.94%4.16%

Correlation

The correlation between DBEF and QTR is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021

0.61

The correlation between DBEF and QTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

DBEF vs. QTR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DBEF
QTR

Financial Services

24.6%
0.2%

Industrials

19.9%
2.8%

Healthcare

10.5%
4.2%

Technology

10.3%
53.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

6.8%
7.7%

Basic Materials

5.9%
1.1%

Communication Services

4.5%
15.8%

Energy

4.1%
0.6%

Utilities

3.9%
1.4%

Real Estate

1.9%
0.1%

Financial Services

DBEF
24.6%
QTR
0.2%

Industrials

DBEF
19.9%
QTR
2.8%

Healthcare

DBEF
10.5%
QTR
4.2%

Technology

DBEF
10.3%
QTR
53.8%

Consumer Cyclical

DBEF
7.5%
QTR
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

DBEF
6.8%
QTR
7.7%

Basic Materials

DBEF
5.9%
QTR
1.1%

Communication Services

DBEF
4.5%
QTR
15.8%

Energy

DBEF
4.1%
QTR
0.6%

Utilities

DBEF
3.9%
QTR
1.4%

Real Estate

DBEF
1.9%
QTR
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBEF vs. QTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBEF
DBEF Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
DBEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBEF Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
DBEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBEF Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

QTR
QTR Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
QTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTR Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
QTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTR Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBEF vs. QTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBEFQTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.41

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

2.76

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.01

9.47

+1.54

DBEF vs. QTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBEF Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the QTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBEF and QTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBEFQTRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

2.40

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.68

-0.13

Drawdowns

DBEF vs. QTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBEF drawdown since its inception was -32.46%, roughly equal to the maximum QTR drawdown of -31.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEF and QTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBEFQTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.46%

-31.72%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.41%

-12.29%

+2.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.62%

-18.99%

+4.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-0.24%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.74%

-8.84%

+4.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

3.57%

-1.34%

Volatility

DBEF vs. QTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) is 3.99%, while Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) has a volatility of 4.52%. This indicates that DBEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBEFQTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

4.52%

-0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.14%

10.68%

-0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.37%

14.14%

-1.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.74%

18.10%

-4.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.79%

18.10%

-2.31%

DBEF vs. QTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBEF has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than QTR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBEF vs. QTR - Dividend Comparison

DBEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, less than QTR's 15.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF
5.03%5.55%1.29%4.46%15.85%2.28%2.41%3.03%3.22%2.98%2.55%3.70%
QTR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF
15.96%18.77%0.50%0.53%0.36%1.90%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBEF and QTR have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTR has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to DBEF (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEF dropped -32.46% vs QTR's -31.72%.

On 3-year performance, QTR leads with 22.93% vs 17.72% for DBEF. On fees, DBEF is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, DBEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, QTR has performed better with a 22.93% return vs 17.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBEF is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QTR.

QTR has the higher dividend yield at 15.96%, compared with 5.03% for DBEF.

DBEF is categorized as Hedge Fund, while QTR is Nasdaq-100. DBEF tracks MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index, while QTR tracks NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for DBEF and 0.60% for QTR.

QTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBEF and QTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer