PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBEF vs. FDSVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBEF vs. FDSVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund (FDSVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DBEF having a 9.52% return and FDSVX slightly higher at 9.96%. Over the past 10 years, DBEF has underperformed FDSVX with an annualized return of 12.28%, while FDSVX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.48% annualized return.


DBEF

1D
0.82%
1M
1.44%
YTD
9.52%
6M
11.55%
1Y
22.84%
3Y*
17.58%
5Y*
12.96%
10Y*
12.28%

FDSVX

1D
-4.21%
1M
-0.84%
YTD
9.96%
6M
8.94%
1Y
23.11%
3Y*
23.39%
5Y*
13.68%
10Y*
18.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBEF vs. FDSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF
9.52%23.16%13.40%20.15%-5.13%19.60%2.03%24.94%-9.52%16.74%
FDSVX
Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund
9.96%15.14%30.19%35.63%-24.43%22.93%43.43%33.77%-0.33%34.63%

Correlation

The correlation between DBEF and FDSVX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2011

0.70

The correlation between DBEF and FDSVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBEF vs. FDSVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBEF
DBEF Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
DBEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBEF Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
DBEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBEF Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FDSVX
FDSVX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FDSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FDSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBEF vs. FDSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund (FDSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBEFFDSVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.26

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

1.96

+0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.24

7.42

+2.82

DBEF vs. FDSVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBEF Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the FDSVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBEF and FDSVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBEFFDSVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

1.45

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

0.67

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.90

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.53

+0.02

Drawdowns

DBEF vs. FDSVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBEF drawdown since its inception was -32.46%, smaller than the maximum FDSVX drawdown of -59.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEF and FDSVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBEFFDSVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.46%

-59.34%

+26.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.41%

-12.53%

+3.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.62%

-23.42%

+8.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.95%

-29.83%

+14.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.46%

-31.09%

-1.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.26%

-4.76%

+3.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.73%

-12.60%

+7.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

3.30%

-1.06%

Volatility

DBEF vs. FDSVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) is 3.60%, while Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund (FDSVX) has a volatility of 5.96%. This indicates that DBEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBEFFDSVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

5.96%

-2.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.41%

13.47%

-3.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.59%

16.91%

-4.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.78%

20.43%

-6.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.81%

20.63%

-4.82%

DBEF vs. FDSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBEF has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than FDSVX's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBEF vs. FDSVX - Dividend Comparison

DBEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, more than FDSVX's 1.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF
5.07%5.55%1.29%4.46%15.85%2.28%2.41%3.03%3.22%2.98%2.55%3.70%
FDSVX
Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund
1.44%1.58%12.81%2.55%3.65%13.46%9.63%4.28%5.02%4.87%0.09%0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBEF and FDSVX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDSVX has higher volatility (5.96%) compared to DBEF (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEF dropped -32.46% vs FDSVX's -59.34%.

DBEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBEF and FDSVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer