FDSVX vs. FTQGX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FDSVX (Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund) and FTQGX (Fidelity Focused Stock Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, FDSVX returned 17.69%/yr vs 17.90%/yr for FTQGX. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FDSVX charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for FTQGX.

Performance

FDSVX vs. FTQGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund (FDSVX) and Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDSVX achieves a 6.17% return, which is significantly lower than FTQGX's 18.58% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FDSVX having a 17.69% annualized return and FTQGX not far ahead at 17.90%.

FDSVX

• 1D: 2.83%
• 1M: -3.45%
• 6M: 5.08%
• YTD: 6.17%
• 1Y: 13.57%
• 3Y*: 19.20%
• 5Y*: 11.67%
• 10Y*: 17.69%
• ALL TIME*: 10.74%

FTQGX

• 1D: 2.20%
• 1M: -5.27%
• 6M: 14.61%
• YTD: 18.58%
• 1Y: 29.14%
• 3Y*: 24.19%
• 5Y*: 13.72%
• 10Y*: 17.90%
• ALL TIME*: 10.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FDSVX Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FTQGX Fidelity Focused Stock Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FDSVX vs. FTQGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDSVX Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund	6.17%	15.14%	30.19%	35.63%	-24.43%	22.93%	43.43%	33.77%	-0.33%	34.63%
FTQGX Fidelity Focused Stock Fund	18.58%	13.65%	36.95%	28.94%	-26.68%	26.91%	33.41%	31.44%	4.90%	30.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FDSVX and FTQGX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 1998	0.92

The correlation between FDSVX and FTQGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FDSVX vs. FTQGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDSVX

FDSVX Risk / Return Rank: 18
FDSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
FDSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
FDSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 16
FDSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
FDSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

FTQGX

FTQGX Risk / Return Rank: 46
FTQGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
FTQGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
FTQGX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
FTQGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
FTQGX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDSVX vs. FTQGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund (FDSVX) and Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDSVX	FTQGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.58	1.14	-0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.92	1.63	-0.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.21	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.88	2.03	-1.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.84	6.94	-4.09

FDSVX vs. FTQGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDSVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the FTQGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDSVX and FTQGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDSVX vs. FTQGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDSVX drawdown since its inception was -59.34%, roughly equal to the maximum FTQGX drawdown of -61.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDSVX and FTQGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDSVX	FTQGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.34%	-61.29%	+1.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.53%	-12.76%	+0.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.42%	-26.84%	+3.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.83%	-32.31%	+2.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.09%	-32.31%	+1.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.04%	-10.41%	+2.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.56%	-14.14%	+1.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.86%	3.73%	+0.13%

Volatility

FDSVX vs. FTQGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund (FDSVX) and Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX) have volatilities of 6.50% and 6.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDSVX	FTQGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.50%	6.79%	-0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.39%	18.80%	-3.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.79%	22.84%	-4.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.76%	22.25%	-1.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.75%	21.83%	-1.08%

FDSVX vs. FTQGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDSVX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than FTQGX's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDSVX vs. FTQGX - Dividend Comparison

FDSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than FTQGX's 10.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDSVX Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund	1.49%	1.58%	12.81%	2.55%	3.65%	13.46%	9.63%	4.28%	5.02%	4.87%	0.09%	0.17%
FTQGX Fidelity Focused Stock Fund	10.49%	12.44%	9.94%	0.61%	7.96%	13.53%	11.41%	5.07%	14.71%	5.89%	1.08%	5.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDSVX and FTQGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, FDSVX and FTQGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FDSVX or FTQGX?

FTQGX has higher volatility (6.79%) compared to FDSVX (6.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDSVX dropped -59.34% vs FTQGX's -61.29%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTQGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.