PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DAT vs. BITU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DAT vs. BITU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF (DAT) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAT achieves a -3.11% return, which is significantly higher than BITU's -52.92% return.


DAT

1D
-4.79%
1M
16.04%
YTD
-3.11%
6M
-3.15%
1Y
-3.73%
3Y*
16.04%
5Y*
10Y*

BITU

1D
-5.58%
1M
-34.84%
YTD
-52.92%
6M
-59.11%
1Y
-73.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DAT vs. BITU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DAT
ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF
-3.11%3.49%22.06%
BITU
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
-52.92%-37.07%37.90%

Correlation

The correlation between DAT and BITU is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024

0.43

DAT vs. BITU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DAT
BITU

Technology

97.1%

-

Communication Services

2.2%

-

Utilities

1.2%

-

Healthcare

0.8%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

4.2%

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

DAT
97.1%
BITU

-

Communication Services

DAT
2.2%
BITU

-

Utilities

DAT
1.2%
BITU

-

Healthcare

DAT
0.8%
BITU

-

Basic Materials

DAT

-

BITU

-

Consumer Cyclical

DAT

-

BITU

-

Consumer Defensive

DAT

-

BITU

-

Energy

DAT

-

BITU

-

Financial Services

DAT

-

BITU
4.2%

Industrials

DAT

-

BITU

-

Real Estate

DAT

-

BITU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DAT vs. BITU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAT
DAT Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
DAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAT Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
DAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAT Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

BITU
BITU Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BITU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITU Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITU Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BITU Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITU Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAT vs. BITU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF (DAT) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DATBITUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

0.84

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.11

-0.93

+0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.25

-1.47

+1.22

DAT vs. BITU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAT Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is higher than the BITU Sharpe Ratio of -0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAT and BITU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DATBITUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

-0.84

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

-0.35

+0.40

Drawdowns

DAT vs. BITU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAT drawdown since its inception was -56.22%, smaller than the maximum BITU drawdown of -78.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAT and BITU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DATBITUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.22%

-78.94%

+22.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.70%

-78.94%

+44.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.08%

-78.94%

+68.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.23%

-34.49%

+8.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.10%

49.84%

-34.74%

Volatility

DAT vs. BITU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF (DAT) is 13.55%, while Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) has a volatility of 18.99%. This indicates that DAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DATBITUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.55%

18.99%

-5.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.18%

69.41%

-44.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.78%

87.00%

-57.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.02%

97.45%

-63.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.02%

97.45%

-63.43%

DAT vs. BITU - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAT has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than BITU's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

DAT vs. BITU - Dividend Comparison

DAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 83.36%.


PositionTTM20252024
BITU
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
83.36%50.23%0.12%
DAT
ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DAT and BITU have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITU has higher volatility (18.99%) compared to DAT (13.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAT dropped -56.22% vs BITU's -78.94%.

On 1-year performance, DAT leads with -3.73% vs -73.07% for BITU. On fees, DAT is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, DAT has been the lower-risk option at 13.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DAT has performed better with a -3.73% return vs -73.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DAT is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BITU.

BITU has the higher dividend yield at 83.36%, compared with 0.00% for DAT.

DAT is categorized as Technology Equities, while BITU is Cryptocurrency. DAT tracks FactSet Big Data Refiners Index, while BITU tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DAT and 0.95% for BITU.

DAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.13 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DAT and BITU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer