DAT vs. SRLN
DAT (ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF) and SRLN (SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DAT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the FactSet Big Data Refiners Index, while SRLN is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Leveraged Loan Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DAT returned 17.95%/yr vs 7.93%/yr for SRLN. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DAT charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for SRLN.
Performance
DAT vs. SRLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DAT achieves a 1.76% return, which is significantly higher than SRLN's 0.80% return.
DAT
- 1D
- -2.75%
- 1M
- 24.72%
- YTD
- 1.76%
- 6M
- 3.26%
- 1Y
- 2.17%
- 3Y*
- 17.95%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SRLN
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- 5.72%
- 3Y*
- 7.93%
- 5Y*
- 4.64%
- 10Y*
- 4.53%
DAT vs. SRLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAT ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF | 1.76% | 3.49% | 33.22% | 51.76% | -44.33% | -3.78% |
SRLN SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan ETF | 0.80% | 6.77% | 8.43% | 11.62% | -5.30% | 0.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between DAT and SRLN is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021 | 0.50 |
The correlation between DAT and SRLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DAT vs. SRLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DAT
SRLN
Technology
-
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
DAT
SRLN
-
Communication Services
DAT
SRLN
Utilities
DAT
SRLN
-
Healthcare
DAT
SRLN
-
Basic Materials
DAT
-
SRLN
-
Consumer Cyclical
DAT
-
SRLN
-
Consumer Defensive
DAT
-
SRLN
-
Energy
DAT
-
SRLN
-
Financial Services
DAT
-
SRLN
-
Industrials
DAT
-
SRLN
Real Estate
DAT
-
SRLN
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DAT vs. SRLN — Risk / Return Rank
DAT
SRLN
DAT vs. SRLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF (DAT) and SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DAT | SRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.07 | 1.99 | -1.92 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.32 | 2.91 | -2.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.46 | -0.42 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.07 | 1.76 | -1.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.17 | 6.54 | -6.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DAT | SRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 | 1.99 | -1.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.70 | -0.62 |
Drawdowns
DAT vs. SRLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAT drawdown since its inception was -56.22%, which is greater than SRLN's maximum drawdown of -22.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAT and SRLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DAT | SRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.22% | -22.29% | -33.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.70% | -3.26% | -31.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.73% | -4.26% | -30.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -7.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.56% | 0.00% | -5.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.25% | -1.10% | -25.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.09% | 0.88% | +14.21% |
Volatility
DAT vs. SRLN - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF (DAT) has a higher volatility of 12.27% compared to SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN) at 0.41%. This indicates that DAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DAT | SRLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.27% | 0.41% | +11.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.70% | 2.64% | +22.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.39% | 2.88% | +26.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.96% | 3.91% | +30.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.96% | 6.06% | +27.90% |
DAT vs. SRLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
DAT has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than SRLN's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
DAT vs. SRLN - Dividend Comparison
DAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SRLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.48%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAT ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRLN SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan ETF | 7.48% | 7.67% | 8.58% | 8.44% | 5.72% | 4.45% | 4.91% | 5.39% | 4.98% | 4.01% | 3.94% | 4.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DAT and SRLN have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DAT has higher volatility (12.27%) compared to SRLN (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAT dropped -56.22% vs SRLN's -22.29%.
On 3-year performance, DAT leads with 17.95% vs 7.93% for SRLN. On fees, DAT is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, SRLN has been the lower-risk option at 0.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DAT has performed better with a 17.95% return vs 7.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DAT is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for SRLN.
SRLN has the higher dividend yield at 7.48%, compared with 0.00% for DAT.
DAT is categorized as Technology Equities, while SRLN is High Yield Bonds. DAT tracks FactSet Big Data Refiners Index, while SRLN tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Leveraged Loan Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DAT and 0.70% for SRLN.
SRLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DAT and SRLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer