DARP vs. DRAM

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

DARP (Grizzle Growth ETF) and DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DARP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Grizzle, while DRAM is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DARP charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DRAM.

Performance

DARP vs. DRAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DARP

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: -2.22%
• YTD: 26.22%
• 6M: 29.87%
• 1Y: 71.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DRAM

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 27.22%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DARP vs. DRAM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
DARP Grizzle Growth ETF	19.62%
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF	140.78%

Correlation

The correlation between DARP and DRAM is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026	0.83

DARP vs. DRAM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DARP	DRAM
Technology	48.3%	100.0%
Communication Services	17.8%	-
Energy	8.2%	-
Industrials	7.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	5.9%	-
Utilities	4.6%	-
Basic Materials	3.2%	-
Healthcare	1.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

DARP vs. DRAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DARP

DARP Risk / Return Rank: 89
DARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
DARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
DARP Omega Ratio Rank: 84
DARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
DARP Martin Ratio Rank: 93

DRAM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DARP vs. DRAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DARP	DRAM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.88	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.31	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.88	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.19	—	—

Drawdowns

DARP vs. DRAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DARP drawdown since its inception was -30.27%, which is greater than DRAM's maximum drawdown of -19.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DARP and DRAM.

Drawdown Indicators

	DARP	DRAM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.27%	-19.97%	-10.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.58%	-6.74%	+1.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.65%	-3.06%	-1.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.27%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DARP	DRAM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.82%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.77%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.11%	87.02%	-62.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.29%	87.02%	-60.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.29%	87.02%	-60.73%

DARP vs. DRAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DARP has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DRAM's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

DARP vs. DRAM - Dividend Comparison

DARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, while DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DARP Grizzle Growth ETF	0.34%	0.43%	1.93%	0.32%
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DARP and DRAM in my portfolio?

DARP and DRAM have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DARP or DRAM?

On fees, DRAM is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DARP or DRAM?

DRAM is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DARP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DARP or DRAM?

DARP has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.00% for DRAM.

What is the main difference between DARP and DRAM?

DARP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while DRAM is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Grizzle and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DARP and 0.65% for DRAM.