DAN vs. CMC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Dana Incorporated (DAN) and Commercial Metals Company (CMC).

Performance

DAN vs. CMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dana Incorporated (DAN) and Commercial Metals Company (CMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DAN vs. CMC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DAN Dana Incorporated	42.11%	110.46%	-17.94%	-0.73%	-32.10%	18.84%	7.98%	36.85%	-56.59%	70.41%
CMC Commercial Metals Company	-11.04%	41.52%	0.41%	4.99%	35.05%	79.83%	-5.45%	42.81%	-23.17%	0.33%

Fundamentals

Market Cap DAN : $4.68B CMC : $6.89B
EPS DAN : -$0.23 CMC : $4.48
Total Revenue (TTM) DAN : $0.00 CMC : $8.39B
Gross Profit (TTM) DAN : $0.00 CMC : $1.49B
EBITDA (TTM) DAN : $0.00 CMC : $905.85M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAN achieves a 42.11% return, which is significantly higher than CMC's -11.04% return. Over the past 10 years, DAN has underperformed CMC with an annualized return of 11.90%, while CMC has yielded a comparatively higher 15.89% annualized return.

DAN

• 1D: 5.75%
• 1M: -1.72%
• YTD: 42.11%
• 6M: 69.28%
• 1Y: 157.65%
• 3Y*: 34.52%
• 5Y*: 9.24%
• 10Y*: 11.90%

CMC

• 1D: 2.23%
• 1M: -16.19%
• YTD: -11.04%
• 6M: 7.82%
• 1Y: 34.71%
• 3Y*: 9.21%
• 5Y*: 16.31%
• 10Y*: 15.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

DAN vs. CMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAN

DAN Risk / Return Rank: 97
DAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
DAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
DAN Omega Ratio Rank: 96
DAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
DAN Martin Ratio Rank: 98

CMC

CMC Risk / Return Rank: 70
CMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
CMC Omega Ratio Rank: 67
CMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
CMC Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAN vs. CMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dana Incorporated (DAN) and Commercial Metals Company (CMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DAN	CMC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.60	0.93	+2.67
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.10	1.47	+2.63
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.19	+0.36
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.67	1.16	+5.51
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	24.34	4.26	+20.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DAN vs. CMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAN Sharpe Ratio is 3.60, which is higher than the CMC Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAN and CMC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DAN	CMC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.60	0.93	+2.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20	0.46	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24	0.40	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.09	0.35	-0.26

Correlation

The correlation between DAN and CMC is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

DAN vs. CMC - Dividend Comparison

DAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, more than CMC's 0.88% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DAN Dana Incorporated	1.25%	1.68%	3.46%	2.74%	2.64%	1.75%	0.51%	2.20%	2.93%	0.75%	1.26%	1.67%
CMC Commercial Metals Company	0.88%	1.04%	1.41%	1.28%	1.20%	1.38%	2.34%	2.16%	3.00%	2.25%	2.20%	3.51%

Drawdowns

DAN vs. CMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAN drawdown since its inception was -98.57%, which is greater than CMC's maximum drawdown of -83.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAN and CMC.

Drawdown Indicators

	DAN	CMC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.57%	-83.77%	-14.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.12%	-29.96%	+5.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-70.19%	-37.63%	-32.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-86.97%	-53.78%	-33.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.63%	-26.17%	+20.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.49%	-23.56%	-11.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.61%	8.16%	-1.55%

Volatility

DAN vs. CMC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dana Incorporated (DAN) is 11.00%, while Commercial Metals Company (CMC) has a volatility of 12.87%. This indicates that DAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DAN	CMC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.00%	12.87%	-1.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.13%	25.83%	+1.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.08%	37.61%	+6.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.84%	35.54%	+11.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.69%	39.65%	+10.04%

Financials

DAN vs. CMC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Dana Incorporated and Commercial Metals Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

DAN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Dana Incorporated reported a gross profit of -528.00M and revenue of -6.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.5%.

CMC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Commercial Metals Company reported a gross profit of 387.91M and revenue of 2.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.2%.

DAN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Dana Incorporated reported an operating income of -208.00M and revenue of -6.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.4%.

CMC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Commercial Metals Company reported an operating income of 154.74M and revenue of 2.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.

DAN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Dana Incorporated reported a net income of -168.00M and revenue of -6.20B, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.

CMC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Commercial Metals Company reported a net income of 93.03M and revenue of 2.13B, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.