PortfoliosLab logo
CMC vs. GGB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CMC and GGB is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CMC vs. GGB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Commercial Metals Company (CMC) and Gerdau S.A. (GGB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CMC:

-0.44

GGB:

-0.66

Sortino Ratio

CMC:

-0.36

GGB:

-0.66

Omega Ratio

CMC:

0.96

GGB:

0.92

Calmar Ratio

CMC:

-0.40

GGB:

-0.27

Martin Ratio

CMC:

-0.86

GGB:

-1.07

Ulcer Index

CMC:

17.65%

GGB:

20.43%

Daily Std Dev

CMC:

38.23%

GGB:

37.89%

Max Drawdown

CMC:

-83.77%

GGB:

-96.35%

Current Drawdown

CMC:

-23.58%

GGB:

-75.36%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CMC:

$5.41B

GGB:

$5.53B

EPS

CMC:

$0.60

GGB:

$0.28

PE Ratio

CMC:

79.77

GGB:

9.93

PEG Ratio

CMC:

12.25

GGB:

0.00

PS Ratio

CMC:

0.70

GGB:

0.08

PB Ratio

CMC:

1.35

GGB:

0.57

Total Revenue (TTM)

CMC:

$7.74B

GGB:

$68.19B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CMC:

$1.19B

GGB:

$8.73B

EBITDA (TTM)

CMC:

$429.51M

GGB:

$8.41B

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CMC having a -2.45% return and GGB slightly lower at -2.47%. Over the past 10 years, CMC has outperformed GGB with an annualized return of 13.68%, while GGB has yielded a comparatively lower 5.57% annualized return.


CMC

YTD

-2.45%

1M

15.21%

6M

-18.58%

1Y

-16.57%

5Y*

28.64%

10Y*

13.68%

GGB

YTD

-2.47%

1M

11.71%

6M

-16.45%

1Y

-24.65%

5Y*

21.91%

10Y*

5.57%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CMC vs. GGB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CMC is 2626
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CMC is 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CMC is 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CMC is 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CMC is 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CMC is 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

GGB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GGB is 2222
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GGB is 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GGB is 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GGB is 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GGB is 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GGB is 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CMC vs. GGB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Commercial Metals Company (CMC) and Gerdau S.A. (GGB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CMC Sharpe Ratio is -0.44, which is higher than the GGB Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMC and GGB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CMC vs. GGB - Dividend Comparison

CMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than GGB's 5.90% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CMC
Commercial Metals Company
1.50%1.41%1.28%1.20%1.38%2.34%2.16%3.00%2.25%2.20%3.51%2.95%
GGB
Gerdau S.A.
5.90%4.92%6.62%12.80%11.50%1.31%1.49%2.77%0.40%0.51%5.67%3.07%

Drawdowns

CMC vs. GGB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMC drawdown since its inception was -83.77%, smaller than the maximum GGB drawdown of -96.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMC and GGB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CMC vs. GGB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Commercial Metals Company (CMC) is 7.88%, while Gerdau S.A. (GGB) has a volatility of 8.94%. This indicates that CMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GGB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CMC vs. GGB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Commercial Metals Company and Gerdau S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20212022202320242025
1.75B
17.38B
(CMC) Total Revenue
(GGB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CMC vs. GGB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Commercial Metals Company and Gerdau S.A. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%20212022202320242025
12.5%
11.2%
(CMC) Gross Margin
(GGB) Gross Margin
CMC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Commercial Metals Company reported a gross profit of 219.55M and revenue of 1.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.5%.

GGB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Gerdau S.A. reported a gross profit of 1.95B and revenue of 17.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.2%.

CMC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Commercial Metals Company reported an operating income of 51.99M and revenue of 1.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.0%.

GGB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Gerdau S.A. reported an operating income of 1.38B and revenue of 17.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.0%.

CMC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Commercial Metals Company reported a net income of 25.47M and revenue of 1.75B, resulting in a net margin of 1.5%.

GGB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Gerdau S.A. reported a net income of 749.49M and revenue of 17.38B, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.