CMC vs. GGB

In the year-to-date period, CMC achieves a -10.31% return, which is significantly lower than GGB's -7.09% return. Over the past 10 years, CMC has outperformed GGB with an annualized return of 12.51%, while GGB has yielded a comparatively lower 4.37% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Commercial Metals Company (CMC) and Gerdau S.A. (GGB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CMC Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is comparable to the GGB Sharpe Ratio of -0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMC and GGB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than GGB's 5.38% yield.

The maximum CMC drawdown since its inception was -83.77%, smaller than the maximum GGB drawdown of -96.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMC and GGB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Commercial Metals Company (CMC) has a higher volatility of 19.28% compared to Gerdau S.A. (GGB) at 17.43%. This indicates that CMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Commercial Metals Company and Gerdau S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.