PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CMC vs. BCC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CMCBCC
YTD Return22.74%15.34%
1Y Return33.00%37.92%
3Y Return (Ann)22.69%37.93%
5Y Return (Ann)26.86%40.20%
10Y Return (Ann)16.21%19.06%
Sharpe Ratio1.191.28
Sortino Ratio2.021.89
Omega Ratio1.241.23
Calmar Ratio1.581.95
Martin Ratio4.914.71
Ulcer Index7.66%10.40%
Daily Std Dev31.48%38.35%
Max Drawdown-83.77%-67.67%
Current Drawdown-3.47%-3.03%

Fundamentals


CMCBCC
Market Cap$7.14B$5.47B
EPS$4.06$10.20
PE Ratio15.1313.95
PEG Ratio12.251.09
Total Revenue (TTM)$7.93B$6.80B
Gross Profit (TTM)$1.38B$1.30B
EBITDA (TTM)$981.95M$616.21M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between CMC and BCC is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CMC vs. BCC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CMC achieves a 22.74% return, which is significantly higher than BCC's 15.34% return. Over the past 10 years, CMC has underperformed BCC with an annualized return of 16.21%, while BCC has yielded a comparatively higher 19.06% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.46%
8.51%
CMC
BCC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CMC vs. BCC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Commercial Metals Company (CMC) and Boise Cascade Company (BCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CMC, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.19
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CMC, currently valued at 2.02, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.02
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CMC, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.24
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CMC, currently valued at 1.58, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.58
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CMC, currently valued at 4.91, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.004.91
BCC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BCC, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.28
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BCC, currently valued at 1.89, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.89
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BCC, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.23
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BCC, currently valued at 1.95, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.95
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BCC, currently valued at 4.71, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.004.71

CMC vs. BCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the BCC Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMC and BCC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.19
1.28
CMC
BCC

Dividends

CMC vs. BCC - Dividend Comparison

CMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than BCC's 7.58% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CMC
Commercial Metals Company
1.15%1.28%1.20%1.38%2.34%2.16%3.00%2.25%2.20%3.51%2.95%2.36%
BCC
Boise Cascade Company
7.58%6.73%5.84%7.61%4.18%3.75%5.45%0.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CMC vs. BCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMC drawdown since its inception was -83.77%, which is greater than BCC's maximum drawdown of -67.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMC and BCC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-3.47%
-3.03%
CMC
BCC

Volatility

CMC vs. BCC - Volatility Comparison

Commercial Metals Company (CMC) has a higher volatility of 16.55% compared to Boise Cascade Company (BCC) at 10.45%. This indicates that CMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
16.55%
10.45%
CMC
BCC

Financials

CMC vs. BCC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Commercial Metals Company and Boise Cascade Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items