CMC vs. FMIL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Commercial Metals Company (CMC) and Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL).

FMIL is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 3, 2020.

Performance

CMC vs. FMIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Commercial Metals Company (CMC) and Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CMC vs. FMIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CMC Commercial Metals Company	-11.04%	41.52%	0.41%	4.99%	35.05%	79.83%	8.20%
FMIL Fidelity New Millennium ETF	-3.67%	17.67%	27.89%	25.07%	-0.04%	24.53%	18.76%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMC achieves a -11.04% return, which is significantly lower than FMIL's -3.67% return.

CMC

• 1D: 2.23%
• 1M: -16.19%
• YTD: -11.04%
• 6M: 7.82%
• 1Y: 34.71%
• 3Y*: 9.21%
• 5Y*: 16.31%
• 10Y*: 15.89%

FMIL

• 1D: 3.48%
• 1M: -5.49%
• YTD: -3.67%
• 6M: -0.80%
• 1Y: 19.26%
• 3Y*: 19.56%
• 5Y*: 14.40%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CMC vs. FMIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMC

CMC Risk / Return Rank: 70
CMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
CMC Omega Ratio Rank: 67
CMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
CMC Martin Ratio Rank: 74

FMIL

FMIL Risk / Return Rank: 66
FMIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
FMIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
FMIL Omega Ratio Rank: 65
FMIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
FMIL Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMC vs. FMIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Commercial Metals Company (CMC) and Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CMC	FMIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.93	1.04	-0.11
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.47	1.55	-0.08
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.23	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.16	1.65	-0.49
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.26	7.14	-2.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CMC vs. FMIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMC Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is comparable to the FMIL Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMC and FMIL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CMC	FMIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93	1.04	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46	0.85	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	1.04	-0.69

Correlation

The correlation between CMC and FMIL is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CMC vs. FMIL - Dividend Comparison

CMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than FMIL's 1.14% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMC Commercial Metals Company	0.88%	1.04%	1.41%	1.28%	1.20%	1.38%	2.34%	2.16%	3.00%	2.25%	2.20%	3.51%
FMIL Fidelity New Millennium ETF	1.14%	1.10%	0.82%	0.57%	1.67%	1.68%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CMC vs. FMIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMC drawdown since its inception was -83.77%, which is greater than FMIL's maximum drawdown of -19.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMC and FMIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CMC	FMIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.77%	-19.72%	-64.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.96%	-11.92%	-18.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.63%	-19.72%	-17.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.17%	-6.85%	-19.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.56%	-3.05%	-20.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.16%	2.76%	+5.40%

Volatility

CMC vs. FMIL - Volatility Comparison

Commercial Metals Company (CMC) has a higher volatility of 12.87% compared to Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL) at 6.13%. This indicates that CMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CMC	FMIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.87%	6.13%	+6.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.83%	10.24%	+15.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.61%	18.67%	+18.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.54%	16.94%	+18.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.65%	17.78%	+21.87%