DAN vs. VIK
DAN (Dana Incorporated) and VIK (Viking Holdings Ltd) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — DAN in Auto Parts, VIK in Travel Services. Over the past year, DAN returned 125.79% vs 90.95% for VIK. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DAN vs. VIK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DAN achieves a 54.90% return, which is significantly higher than VIK's 24.13% return.
DAN
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 5.82%
- YTD
- 54.90%
- 6M
- 63.50%
- 1Y
- 125.79%
- 3Y*
- 41.88%
- 5Y*
- 8.26%
- 10Y*
- 14.33%
VIK
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 12.16%
- YTD
- 24.13%
- 6M
- 31.24%
- 1Y
- 90.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DAN vs. VIK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DAN Dana Incorporated | 54.90% | 110.46% | -10.33% |
VIK Viking Holdings Ltd | 24.13% | 62.07% | 68.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between DAN and VIK is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2024 | 0.38 |
Fundamentals
DAN:
$4.02B
VIK:
$39.52B
DAN:
$7.74
VIK:
$2.69
DAN:
4.73
VIK:
32.94
DAN:
3.57
VIK:
0.12
DAN:
2.05
VIK:
37.05
DAN:
-$484.00M
VIK:
$6.66B
DAN:
-$57.00M
VIK:
$2.58B
DAN:
$302.00M
VIK:
$1.74B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DAN vs. VIK — Risk / Return Rank
DAN
VIK
DAN vs. VIK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dana Incorporated (DAN) and Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DAN | VIK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.38 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.39 | 6.12 | +1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.78 | 16.95 | +3.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DAN | VIK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.41 | 2.42 | +1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 1.96 | -1.87 |
Drawdowns
DAN vs. VIK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAN drawdown since its inception was -98.57%, which is greater than VIK's maximum drawdown of -35.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAN and VIK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DAN | VIK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.57% | -35.39% | -63.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.13% | -14.94% | -2.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.79% | -4.22% | -1.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.21% | -6.11% | -29.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.08% | 5.38% | +0.70% |
Volatility
DAN vs. VIK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dana Incorporated (DAN) is 12.05%, while Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK) has a volatility of 13.50%. This indicates that DAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VIK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DAN | VIK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.05% | 13.50% | -1.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.46% | 31.98% | -4.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.07% | 37.89% | -0.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.72% | 40.95% | +5.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.76% | 40.95% | +8.81% |
Dividends
DAN vs. VIK - Dividend Comparison
DAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, while VIK has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAN Dana Incorporated | 1.20% | 1.68% | 3.46% | 2.74% | 2.64% | 1.75% | 0.51% | 2.20% | 2.93% | 0.75% | 1.26% | 1.67% |
VIK Viking Holdings Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
DAN vs. VIK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dana Incorporated and Viking Holdings Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DAN vs. VIK - Profitability Comparison
DAN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dana Incorporated reported a gross profit of 169.00M and revenue of 1.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.1%.
VIK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Viking Holdings Ltd reported a gross profit of 284.28M and revenue of 1.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.0%.
DAN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dana Incorporated reported an operating income of -15.00M and revenue of 1.87B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.8%.
VIK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Viking Holdings Ltd reported an operating income of 12.06M and revenue of 1.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.1%.
DAN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dana Incorporated reported a net income of 1.09B and revenue of 1.87B, resulting in a net margin of 58.2%.
VIK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Viking Holdings Ltd reported a net income of -54.38M and revenue of 1.05B, resulting in a net margin of -5.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DAN and VIK have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VIK has higher volatility (13.50%) compared to DAN (12.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAN dropped -98.57% vs VIK's -35.39%.
DAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DAN and VIK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer