CMC vs. NUE
CMC (Commercial Metals Company) and NUE (Nucor Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Steel industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 10 years, CMC returned 18.25%/yr vs 20.54%/yr for NUE. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
CMC vs. NUE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMC achieves a 11.27% return, which is significantly lower than NUE's 59.00% return. Over the past 10 years, CMC has underperformed NUE with an annualized return of 18.25%, while NUE has yielded a comparatively higher 20.54% annualized return.
CMC
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- 11.55%
- YTD
- 11.27%
- 6M
- 21.18%
- 1Y
- 57.55%
- 3Y*
- 20.45%
- 5Y*
- 20.59%
- 10Y*
- 18.25%
NUE
- 1D
- 2.77%
- 1M
- 14.34%
- YTD
- 59.00%
- 6M
- 61.54%
- 1Y
- 117.92%
- 3Y*
- 24.09%
- 5Y*
- 21.10%
- 10Y*
- 20.54%
CMC vs. NUE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMC Commercial Metals Company | 11.27% | 41.52% | 0.41% | 4.99% | 35.05% | 79.83% | -5.45% | 42.81% | -23.17% | 0.33% |
NUE Nucor Corporation | 59.00% | 42.03% | -31.95% | 33.75% | 17.39% | 118.45% | -1.77% | 11.84% | -16.36% | 9.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMC and NUE is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 1987 | 0.54 |
The correlation between CMC and NUE shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.73 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CMC:
$8.58B
NUE:
$59.26B
CMC:
$4.50
NUE:
$10.12
CMC:
17.03
NUE:
25.53
CMC:
1.03
NUE:
1.74
CMC:
1.95
NUE:
2.76
CMC:
$8.39B
NUE:
$34.16B
CMC:
$1.49B
NUE:
$4.77B
CMC:
$905.85M
NUE:
$3.49B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMC vs. NUE — Risk / Return Rank
CMC
NUE
CMC vs. NUE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Commercial Metals Company (CMC) and Nucor Corporation (NUE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CMC | NUE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.72 | 4.02 | -2.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.34 | 4.54 | -2.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.57 | -0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | 7.59 | -5.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.33 | 22.86 | -16.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMC | NUE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | 4.02 | -2.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.56 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.57 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.42 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
CMC vs. NUE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMC drawdown since its inception was -83.77%, which is greater than NUE's maximum drawdown of -68.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMC and NUE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMC | NUE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.77% | -68.34% | -15.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.96% | -18.43% | -11.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.63% | -47.79% | +10.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.63% | -47.79% | +10.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.78% | -57.21% | +3.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.66% | 0.00% | -7.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.53% | -21.14% | -2.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.49% | 6.12% | +4.37% |
Volatility
CMC vs. NUE - Volatility Comparison
Commercial Metals Company (CMC) has a higher volatility of 9.76% compared to Nucor Corporation (NUE) at 8.23%. This indicates that CMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMC | NUE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.76% | 8.23% | +1.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.45% | 20.25% | +4.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.13% | 31.11% | +3.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.51% | 37.70% | -2.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.71% | 35.97% | +3.74% |
Dividends
CMC vs. NUE - Dividend Comparison
CMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, more than NUE's 0.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMC Commercial Metals Company | 0.97% | 1.04% | 1.41% | 1.28% | 1.20% | 1.38% | 2.34% | 2.16% | 3.00% | 2.25% | 2.20% | 3.51% |
NUE Nucor Corporation | 0.86% | 1.35% | 1.86% | 1.19% | 1.52% | 1.50% | 3.03% | 2.85% | 2.97% | 2.38% | 2.52% | 3.70% |
Financials
CMC vs. NUE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Commercial Metals Company and Nucor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CMC vs. NUE - Profitability Comparison
CMC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Commercial Metals Company reported a gross profit of 387.91M and revenue of 2.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.2%.
NUE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nucor Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.50B and revenue of 9.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.8%.
CMC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Commercial Metals Company reported an operating income of 154.74M and revenue of 2.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.
NUE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nucor Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 9.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
CMC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Commercial Metals Company reported a net income of 93.03M and revenue of 2.13B, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.
NUE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nucor Corporation reported a net income of 743.00M and revenue of 9.50B, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CMC and NUE have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CMC has higher volatility (9.76%) compared to NUE (8.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMC dropped -83.77% vs NUE's -68.34%.
NUE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.01 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CMC and NUE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer