DAC vs. AXGN
DAC (Danaos Corporation) and AXGN (AxoGen, Inc.) are both stocks. DAC operates in Marine Shipping (Industrials), while AXGN operates in Medical Devices (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, DAC returned 13.38%/yr vs 22.76%/yr for AXGN. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DAC vs. AXGN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DAC achieves a 41.54% return, which is significantly higher than AXGN's 31.38% return. Over the past 10 years, DAC has underperformed AXGN with an annualized return of 13.38%, while AXGN has yielded a comparatively higher 22.76% annualized return.
DAC
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- YTD
- 41.54%
- 6M
- 41.94%
- 1Y
- 52.23%
- 3Y*
- 31.85%
- 5Y*
- 16.62%
- 10Y*
- 13.38%
AXGN
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 31.38%
- 6M
- 41.49%
- 1Y
- 341.03%
- 3Y*
- 66.42%
- 5Y*
- 15.90%
- 10Y*
- 22.76%
DAC vs. AXGN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAC Danaos Corporation | 41.54% | 22.24% | 12.41% | 47.51% | -26.57% | 256.10% | 133.44% | -12.57% | -48.28% | -45.28% |
AXGN AxoGen, Inc. | 31.38% | 98.60% | 141.29% | -31.56% | 6.51% | -47.65% | 0.06% | -12.43% | -27.81% | 214.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between DAC and AXGN is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2006 | 0.11 |
Fundamentals
DAC:
$2.39B
AXGN:
$2.22B
DAC:
$28.34
AXGN:
-$0.66
DAC:
2.31
AXGN:
8.58
DAC:
0.61
AXGN:
9.06
DAC:
$1.04B
AXGN:
$238.11M
DAC:
$705.76M
AXGN:
$178.61M
DAC:
$739.01M
AXGN:
$5.69M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DAC vs. AXGN — Risk / Return Rank
DAC
AXGN
DAC vs. AXGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Danaos Corporation (DAC) and AxoGen, Inc. (AXGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DAC | AXGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.70 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.52 | 17.13 | -12.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.35 | 59.46 | -45.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DAC vs. AXGN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAC drawdown since its inception was -99.42%, roughly equal to the maximum AXGN drawdown of -98.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAC and AXGN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DAC | AXGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.42% | -98.49% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.58% | -19.30% | +6.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.87% | -62.36% | +33.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.14% | -83.69% | +33.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.81% | -93.54% | -2.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.36% | -23.08% | -43.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -80.43% | -64.86% | -15.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.95% | 5.58% | -1.63% |
Volatility
DAC vs. AXGN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Danaos Corporation (DAC) is 6.04%, while AxoGen, Inc. (AXGN) has a volatility of 11.35%. This indicates that DAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AXGN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DAC | AXGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.04% | 11.35% | -5.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.51% | 33.99% | -17.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.41% | 54.01% | -32.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.36% | 64.11% | -29.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.00% | 62.08% | +2.92% |
Dividends
DAC vs. AXGN - Dividend Comparison
DAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, while AXGN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AXGN AxoGen, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DAC Danaos Corporation | 2.70% | 3.66% | 4.06% | 4.12% | 5.70% | 2.01% |
Financials
DAC vs. AXGN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Danaos Corporation and AxoGen, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DAC vs. AXGN - Profitability Comparison
DAC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaos Corporation reported a gross profit of 150.55M and revenue of 253.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.3%.
AXGN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AxoGen, Inc. reported a gross profit of 46.19M and revenue of 61.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.2%.
DAC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaos Corporation reported an operating income of 125.20M and revenue of 253.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.4%.
AXGN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AxoGen, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.83M and revenue of 61.46M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.6%.
DAC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaos Corporation reported a net income of 140.42M and revenue of 253.70M, resulting in a net margin of 55.4%.
AXGN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AxoGen, Inc. reported a net income of -19.58M and revenue of 61.46M, resulting in a net margin of -31.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DAC and AXGN have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AXGN has higher volatility (11.35%) compared to DAC (6.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAC dropped -99.42% vs AXGN's -98.49%.
AXGN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.13 vs 2.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DAC and AXGN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer