DAABX vs. HWSIX
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA U.S. Sustainability Targeted Value Portfolio (DAABX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund (HWSIX).
DAABX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Oct 5, 2020. HWSIX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Sep 20, 1985.
Performance
DAABX vs. HWSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DAABX vs. HWSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAABX DFA U.S. Sustainability Targeted Value Portfolio | 1.59% | 9.62% | 9.07% | 18.81% | -8.37% | 31.44% | 44.33% |
HWSIX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund | 9.06% | 1.60% | 5.00% | 18.85% | 2.97% | 35.54% | 43.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DAABX achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly lower than HWSIX's 9.06% return.
DAABX
- 1D
- 2.51%
- 1M
- -5.98%
- YTD
- 1.59%
- 6M
- 4.42%
- 1Y
- 20.09%
- 3Y*
- 12.49%
- 5Y*
- 7.24%
- 10Y*
- —
HWSIX
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 9.06%
- 6M
- 7.50%
- 1Y
- 18.87%
- 3Y*
- 10.40%
- 5Y*
- 9.25%
- 10Y*
- 10.20%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DAABX vs. HWSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DAABX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than HWSIX's 1.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DAABX vs. HWSIX — Risk / Return Rank
DAABX
HWSIX
DAABX vs. HWSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Sustainability Targeted Value Portfolio (DAABX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund (HWSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DAABX | HWSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 0.79 | +0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.41 | 1.24 | +0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.18 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 1.18 | +0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.12 | 4.41 | -0.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DAABX | HWSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 0.79 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.43 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.45 | +0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between DAABX and HWSIX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DAABX vs. HWSIX - Dividend Comparison
DAABX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, more than HWSIX's 0.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAABX DFA U.S. Sustainability Targeted Value Portfolio | 1.41% | 1.06% | 1.11% | 1.82% | 3.69% | 5.30% | 1.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HWSIX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund | 0.92% | 1.01% | 8.35% | 1.90% | 13.44% | 0.36% | 0.80% | 4.89% | 9.84% | 5.07% | 0.41% | 11.78% |
Drawdowns
DAABX vs. HWSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAABX drawdown since its inception was -26.11%, smaller than the maximum HWSIX drawdown of -72.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAABX and HWSIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DAABX | HWSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.11% | -72.00% | +45.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.44% | -16.44% | +2.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.11% | -26.92% | +0.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -53.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.94% | -1.06% | -7.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.08% | -12.12% | +6.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.25% | 4.42% | -0.17% |
Volatility
DAABX vs. HWSIX - Volatility Comparison
DFA U.S. Sustainability Targeted Value Portfolio (DAABX) has a higher volatility of 6.01% compared to Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund (HWSIX) at 4.45%. This indicates that DAABX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DAABX | HWSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.01% | 4.45% | +1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.69% | 12.99% | -0.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.80% | 23.98% | -1.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.53% | 21.71% | -0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.24% | 24.67% | -2.43% |