PortfoliosLab logo
DAABX vs. FCPVX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between DAABX and FCPVX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

DAABX vs. FCPVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA U.S. Sustainability Targeted Value Portfolio (DAABX) and Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund (FCPVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DAABX:

-0.00

FCPVX:

0.03

Sortino Ratio

DAABX:

0.33

FCPVX:

0.36

Omega Ratio

DAABX:

1.04

FCPVX:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

DAABX:

0.10

FCPVX:

0.13

Martin Ratio

DAABX:

0.27

FCPVX:

0.37

Ulcer Index

DAABX:

9.23%

FCPVX:

8.14%

Daily Std Dev

DAABX:

24.37%

FCPVX:

23.64%

Max Drawdown

DAABX:

-25.84%

FCPVX:

-57.60%

Current Drawdown

DAABX:

-14.26%

FCPVX:

-13.21%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DAABX having a -6.47% return and FCPVX slightly higher at -6.24%.


DAABX

YTD

-6.47%

1M

2.17%

6M

-13.86%

1Y

-0.01%

3Y*

4.69%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FCPVX

YTD

-6.24%

1M

0.42%

6M

-12.90%

1Y

0.60%

3Y*

3.94%

5Y*

14.32%

10Y*

8.11%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DAABX vs. FCPVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAABX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than FCPVX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

DAABX vs. FCPVX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAABX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DAABX is 1414
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DAABX is 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DAABX is 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DAABX is 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DAABX is 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DAABX is 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

FCPVX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FCPVX is 1616
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FCPVX is 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FCPVX is 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FCPVX is 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FCPVX is 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FCPVX is 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DAABX vs. FCPVX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Sustainability Targeted Value Portfolio (DAABX) and Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund (FCPVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current DAABX Sharpe Ratio is -0.00, which is lower than the FCPVX Sharpe Ratio of 0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAABX and FCPVX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

DAABX vs. FCPVX - Dividend Comparison

DAABX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than FCPVX's 6.54% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
DAABX
DFA U.S. Sustainability Targeted Value Portfolio
1.29%1.11%1.82%3.68%5.30%1.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FCPVX
Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund
6.54%6.13%5.20%5.92%7.95%0.46%3.49%36.93%3.64%7.12%11.36%12.26%

Drawdowns

DAABX vs. FCPVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAABX drawdown since its inception was -25.84%, smaller than the maximum FCPVX drawdown of -57.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAABX and FCPVX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

DAABX vs. FCPVX - Volatility Comparison

DFA U.S. Sustainability Targeted Value Portfolio (DAABX) and Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund (FCPVX) have volatilities of 6.99% and 6.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...