PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
DAABX vs. FCPVX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between DAABX and FCPVX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.01.0

Performance

DAABX vs. FCPVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA U.S. Sustainability Targeted Value Portfolio (DAABX) and Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund (FCPVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
4.12%
-1.08%
DAABX
FCPVX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DAABX:

0.85

FCPVX:

0.55

Sortino Ratio

DAABX:

1.33

FCPVX:

0.91

Omega Ratio

DAABX:

1.16

FCPVX:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

DAABX:

1.57

FCPVX:

0.69

Martin Ratio

DAABX:

3.94

FCPVX:

2.16

Ulcer Index

DAABX:

4.21%

FCPVX:

4.83%

Daily Std Dev

DAABX:

19.66%

FCPVX:

19.04%

Max Drawdown

DAABX:

-24.25%

FCPVX:

-58.43%

Current Drawdown

DAABX:

-4.75%

FCPVX:

-4.43%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAABX achieves a 3.91% return, which is significantly lower than FCPVX's 4.76% return.


DAABX

YTD

3.91%

1M

3.54%

6M

4.12%

1Y

15.16%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FCPVX

YTD

4.76%

1M

4.92%

6M

-1.08%

1Y

9.81%

5Y*

7.97%

10Y*

3.55%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DAABX vs. FCPVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAABX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than FCPVX's 0.99% expense ratio.


FCPVX
Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund
Expense ratio chart for FCPVX: current value at 0.99% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.99%
Expense ratio chart for DAABX: current value at 0.36% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.36%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

DAABX vs. FCPVX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAABX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DAABX is 4949
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DAABX is 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DAABX is 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DAABX is 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DAABX is 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DAABX is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

FCPVX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FCPVX is 2828
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FCPVX is 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FCPVX is 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FCPVX is 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FCPVX is 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FCPVX is 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DAABX vs. FCPVX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Sustainability Targeted Value Portfolio (DAABX) and Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund (FCPVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for DAABX, currently valued at 0.85, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.850.55
The chart of Sortino ratio for DAABX, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.330.91
The chart of Omega ratio for DAABX, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.161.11
The chart of Calmar ratio for DAABX, currently valued at 1.57, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.570.69
The chart of Martin ratio for DAABX, currently valued at 3.94, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.003.942.16
DAABX
FCPVX

The current DAABX Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is higher than the FCPVX Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAABX and FCPVX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.85
0.55
DAABX
FCPVX

Dividends

DAABX vs. FCPVX - Dividend Comparison

DAABX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, more than FCPVX's 0.57% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
DAABX
DFA U.S. Sustainability Targeted Value Portfolio
1.07%1.11%1.21%1.27%1.07%0.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FCPVX
Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund
0.57%0.60%0.64%0.00%2.04%0.46%0.81%1.10%1.09%0.77%12.28%12.65%

Drawdowns

DAABX vs. FCPVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAABX drawdown since its inception was -24.25%, smaller than the maximum FCPVX drawdown of -58.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAABX and FCPVX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-4.75%
-4.43%
DAABX
FCPVX

Volatility

DAABX vs. FCPVX - Volatility Comparison

DFA U.S. Sustainability Targeted Value Portfolio (DAABX) and Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund (FCPVX) have volatilities of 4.42% and 4.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
4.42%
4.22%
DAABX
FCPVX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab