HWSIX vs. IWM
Compare and contrast key facts about Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund (HWSIX) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM).
HWSIX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Sep 20, 1985. IWM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000.
Performance
HWSIX vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HWSIX vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWSIX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund | 7.19% | 1.60% | 5.00% | 18.85% | 2.97% | 35.54% | -0.31% | 20.54% | -15.03% | 7.66% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 0.93% | 12.66% | 11.38% | 16.83% | -20.48% | 14.54% | 20.03% | 25.39% | -11.12% | 14.58% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HWSIX achieves a 7.19% return, which is significantly higher than IWM's 0.93% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HWSIX having a 10.01% annualized return and IWM not far behind at 9.76%.
HWSIX
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- YTD
- 7.19%
- 6M
- 5.71%
- 1Y
- 16.85%
- 3Y*
- 9.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.23%
- 10Y*
- 10.01%
IWM
- 1D
- 3.50%
- 1M
- -4.96%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 3.02%
- 1Y
- 25.66%
- 3Y*
- 12.94%
- 5Y*
- 3.34%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HWSIX vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
HWSIX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HWSIX vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank
HWSIX
IWM
HWSIX vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund (HWSIX) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HWSIX | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.73 | 1.11 | -0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.16 | 1.66 | -0.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.21 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | 1.82 | -0.90 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.44 | 6.76 | -3.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HWSIX | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 1.11 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.15 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.43 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.34 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between HWSIX and IWM is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HWSIX vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
HWSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than IWM's 1.02% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWSIX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund | 0.94% | 1.01% | 8.35% | 1.90% | 13.44% | 0.36% | 0.80% | 4.89% | 9.84% | 5.07% | 0.41% | 11.78% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 1.02% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% |
Drawdowns
HWSIX vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HWSIX drawdown since its inception was -72.00%, which is greater than IWM's maximum drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWSIX and IWM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HWSIX | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.00% | -59.05% | -12.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.44% | -13.74% | -2.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.92% | -31.91% | +4.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.67% | -41.13% | -12.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.75% | -7.91% | +5.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.12% | -10.83% | -1.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.42% | 3.70% | +0.72% |
Volatility
HWSIX vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund (HWSIX) is 4.15%, while iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has a volatility of 7.47%. This indicates that HWSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HWSIX | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 7.47% | -3.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.90% | 14.47% | -1.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.97% | 23.18% | +0.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.70% | 22.55% | -0.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.67% | 22.99% | +1.68% |