DAABX vs. AVUV
DAABX (DFA U.S. Sustainability Targeted Value Portfolio) and AVUV (Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, DAABX returned 8.24%/yr vs 10.71%/yr for AVUV. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DAABX charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AVUV.
Performance
DAABX vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DAABX achieves a 12.26% return, which is significantly lower than AVUV's 17.96% return.
DAABX
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 3.29%
- YTD
- 12.26%
- 6M
- 12.63%
- 1Y
- 29.92%
- 3Y*
- 16.27%
- 5Y*
- 8.24%
- 10Y*
- —
AVUV
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 17.96%
- 6M
- 17.23%
- 1Y
- 36.48%
- 3Y*
- 19.24%
- 5Y*
- 10.71%
- 10Y*
- —
DAABX vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAABX DFA U.S. Sustainability Targeted Value Portfolio | 12.26% | 9.62% | 9.07% | 18.81% | -8.37% | 31.44% | 44.33% |
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 17.96% | 7.44% | 9.28% | 22.82% | -4.91% | 42.20% | 43.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between DAABX and AVUV is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2020 | 0.97 |
The correlation between DAABX and AVUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DAABX vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank
DAABX
AVUV
DAABX vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Sustainability Targeted Value Portfolio (DAABX) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DAABX | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.36 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 4.61 | -1.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.02 | 13.69 | -4.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DAABX | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | 2.10 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.47 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.56 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
DAABX vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAABX drawdown since its inception was -26.11%, smaller than the maximum AVUV drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAABX and AVUV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DAABX | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.11% | -49.42% | +23.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.13% | -7.95% | -4.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.11% | -28.79% | +2.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.11% | -28.79% | +2.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.12% | +1.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.98% | -7.95% | +1.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.57% | 2.67% | +0.90% |
Volatility
DAABX vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison
DFA U.S. Sustainability Targeted Value Portfolio (DAABX) has a higher volatility of 5.02% compared to Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) at 4.08%. This indicates that DAABX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DAABX | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.02% | 4.08% | +0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.10% | 11.34% | +0.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.74% | 17.54% | +0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.48% | 22.74% | -1.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.10% | 28.30% | -6.20% |
DAABX vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DAABX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
DAABX vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison
DAABX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, which matches AVUV's 1.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 1.29% | 1.58% | 1.61% | 1.65% | 1.74% | 1.28% | 1.21% | 0.38% |
DAABX DFA U.S. Sustainability Targeted Value Portfolio | 1.28% | 1.06% | 1.11% | 1.82% | 3.69% | 5.30% | 1.19% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, DAABX and AVUV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DAABX has higher volatility (5.02%) compared to AVUV (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAABX dropped -26.11% vs AVUV's -49.42%.
AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DAABX and AVUV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer