PortfoliosLab logo
DAABX vs. VBR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between DAABX and VBR is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

DAABX vs. VBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA U.S. Sustainability Targeted Value Portfolio (DAABX) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DAABX:

-0.04

VBR:

0.03

Sortino Ratio

DAABX:

0.18

VBR:

0.28

Omega Ratio

DAABX:

1.02

VBR:

1.04

Calmar Ratio

DAABX:

0.01

VBR:

0.08

Martin Ratio

DAABX:

0.02

VBR:

0.25

Ulcer Index

DAABX:

8.77%

VBR:

7.89%

Daily Std Dev

DAABX:

23.79%

VBR:

21.24%

Max Drawdown

DAABX:

-25.84%

VBR:

-62.01%

Current Drawdown

DAABX:

-14.96%

VBR:

-13.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAABX achieves a -7.24% return, which is significantly lower than VBR's -5.66% return.


DAABX

YTD

-7.24%

1M

5.44%

6M

-12.28%

1Y

-0.98%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

VBR

YTD

-5.66%

1M

5.09%

6M

-11.19%

1Y

0.72%

5Y*

15.54%

10Y*

7.76%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DAABX vs. VBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAABX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than VBR's 0.07% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

DAABX vs. VBR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAABX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DAABX is 2323
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DAABX is 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DAABX is 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DAABX is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DAABX is 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DAABX is 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

VBR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VBR is 2424
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VBR is 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VBR is 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VBR is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VBR is 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VBR is 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DAABX vs. VBR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Sustainability Targeted Value Portfolio (DAABX) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current DAABX Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the VBR Sharpe Ratio of 0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAABX and VBR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

DAABX vs. VBR - Dividend Comparison

DAABX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than VBR's 2.27% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
DAABX
DFA U.S. Sustainability Targeted Value Portfolio
1.30%1.11%1.21%1.27%1.07%0.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
2.27%1.98%2.12%2.03%1.75%1.68%2.06%2.35%1.79%1.77%1.99%1.77%

Drawdowns

DAABX vs. VBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAABX drawdown since its inception was -25.84%, smaller than the maximum VBR drawdown of -62.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAABX and VBR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

DAABX vs. VBR - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...