PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
DAABX vs. FISVX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


DAABXFISVX
YTD Return15.61%16.15%
1Y Return37.95%38.75%
3Y Return (Ann)7.04%2.90%
Sharpe Ratio1.811.75
Sortino Ratio2.682.59
Omega Ratio1.321.31
Calmar Ratio2.971.73
Martin Ratio10.119.62
Ulcer Index3.72%4.02%
Daily Std Dev20.75%22.05%
Max Drawdown-20.93%-44.66%
Current Drawdown-1.18%-1.77%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.01.0

The correlation between DAABX and FISVX is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

DAABX vs. FISVX - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DAABX having a 15.61% return and FISVX slightly higher at 16.15%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
12.36%
13.69%
DAABX
FISVX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DAABX vs. FISVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAABX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than FISVX's 0.05% expense ratio.


DAABX
DFA U.S. Sustainability Targeted Value Portfolio
Expense ratio chart for DAABX: current value at 0.36% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.36%
Expense ratio chart for FISVX: current value at 0.05% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.05%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

DAABX vs. FISVX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Sustainability Targeted Value Portfolio (DAABX) and Fidelity Small Cap Value Index Fund (FISVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DAABX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for DAABX, currently valued at 1.81, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.81
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for DAABX, currently valued at 2.68, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.68
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for DAABX, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.32
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for DAABX, currently valued at 2.97, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.002.97
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for DAABX, currently valued at 10.11, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0010.11
FISVX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FISVX, currently valued at 1.75, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.75
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FISVX, currently valued at 2.59, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.59
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FISVX, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.31
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FISVX, currently valued at 1.73, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.001.73
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FISVX, currently valued at 9.62, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.009.62

DAABX vs. FISVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAABX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the FISVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAABX and FISVX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.81
1.75
DAABX
FISVX

Dividends

DAABX vs. FISVX - Dividend Comparison

DAABX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than FISVX's 1.59% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019
DAABX
DFA U.S. Sustainability Targeted Value Portfolio
1.07%1.21%1.27%1.07%0.80%0.00%
FISVX
Fidelity Small Cap Value Index Fund
1.59%2.06%1.94%1.58%1.33%0.55%

Drawdowns

DAABX vs. FISVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAABX drawdown since its inception was -20.93%, smaller than the maximum FISVX drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAABX and FISVX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.18%
-1.77%
DAABX
FISVX

Volatility

DAABX vs. FISVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA U.S. Sustainability Targeted Value Portfolio (DAABX) is 7.58%, while Fidelity Small Cap Value Index Fund (FISVX) has a volatility of 8.03%. This indicates that DAABX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FISVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.58%
8.03%
DAABX
FISVX