CZMVX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Multi-Manager Value Strategies Fund (CZMVX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
CZMVX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Jan 3, 2017. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
CZMVX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CZMVX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CZMVX Multi-Manager Value Strategies Fund | 2.83% | 12.82% | 12.90% | 11.85% | -7.94% | 25.55% | 5.88% | 28.61% | -9.10% | 17.86% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -0.70% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 14.30% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CZMVX achieves a 2.83% return, which is significantly higher than FASGX's -0.70% return.
CZMVX
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- -4.34%
- YTD
- 2.83%
- 6M
- 5.95%
- 1Y
- 13.95%
- 3Y*
- 13.56%
- 5Y*
- 8.58%
- 10Y*
- —
FASGX
- 1D
- 2.36%
- 1M
- -4.75%
- YTD
- -0.70%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 17.75%
- 3Y*
- 12.59%
- 5Y*
- 6.64%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CZMVX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CZMVX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CZMVX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
CZMVX
FASGX
CZMVX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Multi-Manager Value Strategies Fund (CZMVX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CZMVX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 1.41 | -0.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.33 | 2.01 | -0.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.30 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 2.00 | -0.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.82 | 8.74 | -2.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CZMVX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 1.41 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.55 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.60 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between CZMVX and FASGX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CZMVX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
CZMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.01%, more than FASGX's 7.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CZMVX Multi-Manager Value Strategies Fund | 15.01% | 15.46% | 9.03% | 6.53% | 11.79% | 8.01% | 2.45% | 3.62% | 8.47% | 4.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.39% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
CZMVX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CZMVX drawdown since its inception was -37.43%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CZMVX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CZMVX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.43% | -47.35% | +9.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.62% | -9.07% | -2.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.85% | -23.54% | +3.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.52% | -5.77% | +1.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.62% | -6.74% | +2.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 2.07% | +0.51% |
Volatility
CZMVX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Multi-Manager Value Strategies Fund (CZMVX) is 3.74%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that CZMVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CZMVX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.74% | 5.30% | -1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.93% | 8.12% | -0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.50% | 13.00% | +2.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.87% | 12.18% | +2.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.80% | 12.58% | +5.22% |