PortfoliosLab logo
CZMVX vs. VOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CZMVX and VOO is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

CZMVX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Multi-Manager Value Strategies Fund (CZMVX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CZMVX:

0.05

VOO:

0.74

Sortino Ratio

CZMVX:

0.15

VOO:

1.04

Omega Ratio

CZMVX:

1.02

VOO:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

CZMVX:

0.02

VOO:

0.68

Martin Ratio

CZMVX:

0.05

VOO:

2.58

Ulcer Index

CZMVX:

8.26%

VOO:

4.93%

Daily Std Dev

CZMVX:

17.91%

VOO:

19.54%

Max Drawdown

CZMVX:

-37.42%

VOO:

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

CZMVX:

-11.16%

VOO:

-3.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CZMVX achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 0.90% return.


CZMVX

YTD

1.55%

1M

3.75%

6M

-11.16%

1Y

0.95%

3Y*

0.10%

5Y*

6.40%

10Y*

N/A

VOO

YTD

0.90%

1M

6.28%

6M

-1.46%

1Y

14.27%

3Y*

14.31%

5Y*

15.89%

10Y*

12.81%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

CZMVX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CZMVX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CZMVX vs. VOO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CZMVX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CZMVX is 1212
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CZMVX is 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CZMVX is 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CZMVX is 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CZMVX is 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CZMVX is 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VOO is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VOO is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VOO is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VOO is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VOO is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VOO is 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CZMVX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Multi-Manager Value Strategies Fund (CZMVX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CZMVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CZMVX and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

CZMVX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

CZMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.94%, more than VOO's 1.29% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CZMVX
Multi-Manager Value Strategies Fund
8.94%9.02%6.54%11.79%8.01%2.45%3.61%8.48%4.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.29%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%1.85%

Drawdowns

CZMVX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CZMVX drawdown since its inception was -37.42%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CZMVX and VOO.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

CZMVX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Multi-Manager Value Strategies Fund (CZMVX) is 4.57%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that CZMVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...