CZMSX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Multi-Manager Small Cap Equity Strategies Fund (CZMSX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
CZMSX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Jan 3, 2017. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
CZMSX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CZMSX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CZMSX Multi-Manager Small Cap Equity Strategies Fund | 0.46% | 1.55% | 8.55% | 15.65% | -20.05% | 19.40% | 20.47% | 27.16% | -10.77% | 14.84% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -0.70% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 14.30% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CZMSX achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly higher than FASGX's -0.70% return.
CZMSX
- 1D
- 3.01%
- 1M
- -5.52%
- YTD
- 0.46%
- 6M
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 13.34%
- 3Y*
- 7.51%
- 5Y*
- 1.44%
- 10Y*
- —
FASGX
- 1D
- 2.36%
- 1M
- -4.75%
- YTD
- -0.70%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 17.75%
- 3Y*
- 12.59%
- 5Y*
- 6.64%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CZMSX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CZMSX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CZMSX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
CZMSX
FASGX
CZMSX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Multi-Manager Small Cap Equity Strategies Fund (CZMSX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CZMSX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.61 | 1.41 | -0.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.03 | 2.01 | -0.98 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.30 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | 2.00 | -1.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.55 | 8.74 | -5.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CZMSX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | 1.41 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.55 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.60 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between CZMSX and FASGX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CZMSX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
CZMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.81%, more than FASGX's 7.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CZMSX Multi-Manager Small Cap Equity Strategies Fund | 8.81% | 8.85% | 3.05% | 2.04% | 10.31% | 17.14% | 0.31% | 5.75% | 7.94% | 7.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.39% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
CZMSX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CZMSX drawdown since its inception was -40.96%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CZMSX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CZMSX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.96% | -47.35% | +6.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.87% | -9.07% | -4.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.16% | -23.54% | -13.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.22% | -5.77% | -7.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.81% | -6.74% | -7.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.69% | 2.07% | +1.62% |
Volatility
CZMSX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
Multi-Manager Small Cap Equity Strategies Fund (CZMSX) has a higher volatility of 6.72% compared to Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) at 5.30%. This indicates that CZMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CZMSX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.72% | 5.30% | +1.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.04% | 8.12% | +4.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.49% | 13.00% | +9.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.93% | 12.18% | +11.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.27% | 12.58% | +11.69% |