PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CZMSX vs. CAMSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CZMSX vs. CAMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Multi-Manager Small Cap Equity Strategies Fund (CZMSX) and Cambiar Small Cap Fund (CAMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CZMSX achieves a 16.84% return, which is significantly lower than CAMSX's 19.43% return.


CZMSX

1D
0.56%
1M
4.43%
YTD
16.84%
6M
14.52%
1Y
26.76%
3Y*
12.77%
5Y*
4.20%
10Y*

CAMSX

1D
0.31%
1M
3.52%
YTD
19.43%
6M
17.79%
1Y
31.19%
3Y*
14.03%
5Y*
7.18%
10Y*
10.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CZMSX vs. CAMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CZMSX
Multi-Manager Small Cap Equity Strategies Fund
16.84%1.55%8.55%15.65%-20.05%19.40%20.47%27.16%-10.77%14.84%
CAMSX
Cambiar Small Cap Fund
19.43%8.91%6.01%12.12%-8.70%17.24%9.52%29.01%-12.51%3.26%

Correlation

The correlation between CZMSX and CAMSX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

0.94

The correlation between CZMSX and CAMSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CZMSX vs. CAMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CZMSX
CZMSX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
CZMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CZMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CZMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
CZMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
CZMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

CAMSX
CAMSX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
CAMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
CAMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CZMSX vs. CAMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Multi-Manager Small Cap Equity Strategies Fund (CZMSX) and Cambiar Small Cap Fund (CAMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CZMSXCAMSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.34

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

3.17

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.43

10.15

-0.72

CZMSX vs. CAMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CZMSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the CAMSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CZMSX and CAMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CZMSX vs. CAMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CZMSX drawdown since its inception was -40.96%, smaller than the maximum CAMSX drawdown of -58.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CZMSX and CAMSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CZMSXCAMSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.96%

-58.43%

+17.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.00%

-10.44%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.73%

-22.14%

-5.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.16%

-22.14%

-15.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.58%

-8.82%

-4.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

3.25%

-0.23%

Volatility

CZMSX vs. CAMSX - Volatility Comparison

Multi-Manager Small Cap Equity Strategies Fund (CZMSX) and Cambiar Small Cap Fund (CAMSX) have volatilities of 5.12% and 5.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CZMSXCAMSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.12%

5.29%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.75%

12.33%

+0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.15%

16.97%

+1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.92%

18.79%

+5.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.12%

20.78%

+3.34%

CZMSX vs. CAMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CZMSX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than CAMSX's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

CZMSX vs. CAMSX - Dividend Comparison

CZMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.57%, less than CAMSX's 8.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAMSX
Cambiar Small Cap Fund
8.88%10.60%3.52%1.35%0.48%32.84%0.34%4.82%24.24%4.61%0.00%8.66%
CZMSX
Multi-Manager Small Cap Equity Strategies Fund
7.57%8.85%3.05%2.04%10.31%17.14%0.31%5.75%7.94%7.88%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, CZMSX and CAMSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CAMSX has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to CZMSX (5.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CZMSX dropped -40.96% vs CAMSX's -58.43%.

CAMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CZMSX and CAMSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer