CYD vs. ASHR
CYD (China Yuchai International Limited) is a stock, while ASHR (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF) is China Equities fund tracking the CSI 300 Index. Over the past 10 years, CYD returned 20.48%/yr vs 5.90%/yr for ASHR. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CYD vs. ASHR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CYD achieves a 29.52% return, which is significantly higher than ASHR's 9.16% return. Over the past 10 years, CYD has outperformed ASHR with an annualized return of 20.48%, while ASHR has yielded a comparatively lower 5.90% annualized return.
CYD
- 1D
- -6.64%
- 1M
- -19.83%
- YTD
- 29.52%
- 6M
- 28.36%
- 1Y
- 102.02%
- 3Y*
- 71.03%
- 5Y*
- 24.57%
- 10Y*
- 20.48%
ASHR
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 9.16%
- 6M
- 9.26%
- 1Y
- 34.40%
- 3Y*
- 12.55%
- 5Y*
- -0.97%
- 10Y*
- 5.90%
CYD vs. ASHR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CYD China Yuchai International Limited | 29.52% | 281.18% | 17.72% | 21.67% | -50.38% | 0.21% | 29.89% | 13.35% | -46.44% | 82.82% |
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF | 9.16% | 27.02% | 11.95% | -12.52% | -27.52% | -1.57% | 36.29% | 36.50% | -28.45% | 33.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between CYD and ASHR is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2013 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CYD vs. ASHR — Risk / Return Rank
CYD
ASHR
CYD vs. ASHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Yuchai International Limited (CYD) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF (ASHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CYD | ASHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.34 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 4.49 | -1.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.20 | 12.97 | -5.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CYD vs. ASHR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CYD drawdown since its inception was -97.74%, which is greater than ASHR's maximum drawdown of -51.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CYD and ASHR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CYD | ASHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.74% | -51.30% | -46.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.21% | -7.69% | -26.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.46% | -33.12% | -11.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.32% | -44.59% | -13.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.53% | -51.30% | -17.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.99% | -16.36% | -6.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.97% | -29.12% | -23.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.23% | 2.66% | +11.57% |
Volatility
CYD vs. ASHR - Volatility Comparison
China Yuchai International Limited (CYD) has a higher volatility of 17.77% compared to Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF (ASHR) at 7.34%. This indicates that CYD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CYD | ASHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.77% | 7.34% | +10.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.04% | 12.96% | +28.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.27% | 17.89% | +37.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.07% | 24.01% | +26.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.73% | 24.09% | +20.64% |
Dividends
CYD vs. ASHR - Dividend Comparison
CYD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than ASHR's 2.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF | 2.11% | 2.31% | 1.13% | 2.48% | 1.13% | 0.88% | 0.81% | 0.98% | 1.32% | 0.84% | 0.73% | 30.13% |
CYD China Yuchai International Limited | 1.15% | 1.49% | 3.99% | 3.34% | 5.65% | 11.39% | 5.20% | 6.38% | 5.87% | 3.75% | 6.15% | 10.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CYD and ASHR have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CYD has higher volatility (17.77%) compared to ASHR (7.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CYD dropped -97.74% vs ASHR's -51.30%.
ASHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CYD and ASHR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer