PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CYD vs. ASHR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CYD vs. ASHR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in China Yuchai International Limited (CYD) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CYD achieves a 62.45% return, which is significantly higher than ASHR's 10.11% return. Over the past 10 years, CYD has outperformed ASHR with an annualized return of 22.81%, while ASHR has yielded a comparatively lower 5.38% annualized return.


CYD

1D
-2.09%
1M
47.12%
YTD
62.45%
6M
63.97%
1Y
244.50%
3Y*
90.41%
5Y*
35.54%
10Y*
22.81%

ASHR

1D
-0.14%
1M
3.02%
YTD
10.11%
6M
13.67%
1Y
39.07%
3Y*
12.07%
5Y*
-1.24%
10Y*
5.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CYD vs. ASHR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CYD
China Yuchai International Limited
62.45%281.18%17.72%21.67%-50.38%0.21%29.89%13.35%-46.44%82.82%
ASHR
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund
10.11%27.02%11.95%-12.52%-27.52%-1.57%36.29%36.50%-28.45%33.47%

Correlation

The correlation between CYD and ASHR is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2013

0.19

The correlation between CYD and ASHR shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (3 years) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CYD vs. ASHR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CYD
CYD Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
CYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CYD Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
CYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CYD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

ASHR
ASHR Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ASHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASHR Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ASHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASHR Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CYD vs. ASHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Yuchai International Limited (CYD) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CYDASHRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.41

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.20

5.10

+2.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.86

15.76

+2.10

CYD vs. ASHR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CYD Sharpe Ratio is 4.45, which is higher than the ASHR Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CYD and ASHR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CYDASHRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.45

2.33

+2.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

-0.05

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.22

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.23

-0.08

Drawdowns

CYD vs. ASHR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CYD drawdown since its inception was -97.74%, which is greater than ASHR's maximum drawdown of -51.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CYD and ASHR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CYDASHRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.74%

-51.30%

-46.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.21%

-7.69%

-26.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.46%

-33.12%

-11.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.56%

-45.76%

-12.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.53%

-51.30%

-17.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.42%

-15.63%

+12.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.04%

-29.18%

-23.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.76%

2.49%

+11.27%

Volatility

CYD vs. ASHR - Volatility Comparison

China Yuchai International Limited (CYD) has a higher volatility of 13.81% compared to Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) at 5.87%. This indicates that CYD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CYDASHRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.81%

5.87%

+7.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.89%

11.53%

+26.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.28%

16.84%

+38.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.81%

23.89%

+25.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.50%

24.06%

+20.44%

Dividends

CYD vs. ASHR - Dividend Comparison

CYD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than ASHR's 2.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASHR
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund
2.10%2.31%1.13%2.48%1.13%0.88%0.81%0.98%1.32%0.84%0.73%30.13%
CYD
China Yuchai International Limited
0.92%1.49%3.99%3.34%5.65%11.39%5.20%6.38%5.87%3.75%6.15%10.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


CYD and ASHR have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CYD has higher volatility (13.81%) compared to ASHR (5.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CYD dropped -97.74% vs ASHR's -51.30%.

CYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.45 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CYD and ASHR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer