PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CYD vs. ASHR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CYD vs. ASHR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in China Yuchai International Limited (CYD) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF (ASHR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CYD achieves a 29.52% return, which is significantly higher than ASHR's 9.16% return. Over the past 10 years, CYD has outperformed ASHR with an annualized return of 20.48%, while ASHR has yielded a comparatively lower 5.90% annualized return.


CYD

1D
-6.64%
1M
-19.83%
YTD
29.52%
6M
28.36%
1Y
102.02%
3Y*
71.03%
5Y*
24.57%
10Y*
20.48%

ASHR

1D
-0.55%
1M
1.44%
YTD
9.16%
6M
9.26%
1Y
34.40%
3Y*
12.55%
5Y*
-0.97%
10Y*
5.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CYD vs. ASHR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CYD
China Yuchai International Limited
29.52%281.18%17.72%21.67%-50.38%0.21%29.89%13.35%-46.44%82.82%
ASHR
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF
9.16%27.02%11.95%-12.52%-27.52%-1.57%36.29%36.50%-28.45%33.47%

Correlation

The correlation between CYD and ASHR is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2013

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CYD vs. ASHR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CYD
CYD Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
CYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
CYD Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
CYD Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

ASHR
ASHR Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ASHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASHR Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
ASHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASHR Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CYD vs. ASHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Yuchai International Limited (CYD) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF (ASHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CYDASHRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.34

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

4.49

-1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.20

12.97

-5.77

CYD vs. ASHR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CYD Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the ASHR Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CYD and ASHR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CYD vs. ASHR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CYD drawdown since its inception was -97.74%, which is greater than ASHR's maximum drawdown of -51.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CYD and ASHR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CYDASHRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.74%

-51.30%

-46.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.21%

-7.69%

-26.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.46%

-33.12%

-11.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.32%

-44.59%

-13.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.53%

-51.30%

-17.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.99%

-16.36%

-6.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.97%

-29.12%

-23.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.23%

2.66%

+11.57%

Volatility

CYD vs. ASHR - Volatility Comparison

China Yuchai International Limited (CYD) has a higher volatility of 17.77% compared to Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF (ASHR) at 7.34%. This indicates that CYD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CYDASHRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.77%

7.34%

+10.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.04%

12.96%

+28.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.27%

17.89%

+37.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.07%

24.01%

+26.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.73%

24.09%

+20.64%

Dividends

CYD vs. ASHR - Dividend Comparison

CYD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than ASHR's 2.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASHR
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF
2.11%2.31%1.13%2.48%1.13%0.88%0.81%0.98%1.32%0.84%0.73%30.13%
CYD
China Yuchai International Limited
1.15%1.49%3.99%3.34%5.65%11.39%5.20%6.38%5.87%3.75%6.15%10.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


CYD and ASHR have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CYD has higher volatility (17.77%) compared to ASHR (7.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CYD dropped -97.74% vs ASHR's -51.30%.

ASHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CYD and ASHR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer