CXW vs. ARM
CXW (CoreCivic, Inc.) and ARM (Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares) are both stocks. CXW operates in REIT - Specialty (Real Estate), while ARM operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past year, CXW returned 44.70% vs 181.11% for ARM. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CXW vs. ARM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CXW achieves a 55.15% return, which is significantly lower than ARM's 272.99% return.
CXW
- 1D
- 2.60%
- 1M
- 37.91%
- YTD
- 55.15%
- 6M
- 53.31%
- 1Y
- 44.70%
- 3Y*
- 46.40%
- 5Y*
- 21.41%
- 10Y*
- 2.02%
ARM
- 1D
- -7.22%
- 1M
- 33.02%
- YTD
- 272.99%
- 6M
- 259.89%
- 1Y
- 181.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CXW vs. ARM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CXW CoreCivic, Inc. | 55.15% | -12.10% | 49.62% | 43.72% |
ARM Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares | 272.99% | -11.39% | 64.16% | 33.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between CXW and ARM is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2023 | 0.19 |
Fundamentals
CXW:
$1.60
ARM:
$0.85
CXW:
18.48
ARM:
481.57
CXW:
0.46
ARM:
16.52
CXW:
1.02
ARM:
88.48
CXW:
$2.34B
ARM:
$4.92B
CXW:
$404.76M
ARM:
$4.66B
CXW:
$309.65M
ARM:
$1.37B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CXW vs. ARM — Risk / Return Rank
CXW
ARM
CXW vs. ARM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) and Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares (ARM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CXW | ARM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.40 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 4.40 | -2.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.21 | 8.63 | -5.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CXW vs. ARM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CXW drawdown since its inception was -98.54%, which is greater than ARM's maximum drawdown of -53.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXW and ARM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CXW | ARM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.54% | -53.97% | -44.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.41% | -41.47% | +13.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -7.22% | +7.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.65% | -21.19% | -35.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.95% | 21.08% | -7.13% |
Volatility
CXW vs. ARM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) is 10.50%, while Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares (ARM) has a volatility of 36.10%. This indicates that CXW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CXW | ARM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.50% | 36.10% | -25.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.82% | 58.43% | -28.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.03% | 70.18% | -32.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.41% | 76.75% | -33.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.35% | 76.75% | -27.40% |
Dividends
CXW vs. ARM - Dividend Comparison
Neither CXW nor ARM has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARM Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CXW CoreCivic, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 13.44% | 7.59% | 9.65% | 7.47% | 8.34% | 8.15% |
Financials
CXW vs. ARM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CoreCivic, Inc. and Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CXW vs. ARM - Profitability Comparison
CXW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CoreCivic, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 614.73M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ARM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares reported a gross profit of 1.39B and revenue of 1.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 93.1%.
CXW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CoreCivic, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 614.73M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
ARM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares reported an operating income of 440.00M and revenue of 1.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.5%.
CXW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CoreCivic, Inc. reported a net income of 37.92M and revenue of 614.73M, resulting in a net margin of 6.2%.
ARM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares reported a net income of 313.00M and revenue of 1.49B, resulting in a net margin of 21.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CXW and ARM have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARM has higher volatility (36.10%) compared to CXW (10.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXW dropped -98.54% vs ARM's -53.97%.
ARM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CXW and ARM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer