PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CXW vs. IRM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CXWIRM
YTD Return2.13%12.52%
1Y Return71.16%48.54%
3Y Return (Ann)24.11%30.78%
5Y Return (Ann)-4.92%27.29%
10Y Return (Ann)-3.16%18.91%
Sharpe Ratio2.182.08
Daily Std Dev31.60%22.40%
Max Drawdown-97.76%-55.71%
Current Drawdown-45.68%-3.50%

Fundamentals


CXWIRM
Market Cap$1.68B$22.72B
EPS$0.59$0.63
PE Ratio25.53123.05
PEG Ratio1.441.08
Revenue (TTM)$1.90B$5.48B
Gross Profit (TTM)$431.54M$2.91B
EBITDA (TTM)$298.12M$1.83B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between CXW and IRM is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CXW vs. IRM - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CXW achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly lower than IRM's 12.52% return. Over the past 10 years, CXW has underperformed IRM with an annualized return of -3.16%, while IRM has yielded a comparatively higher 18.91% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%500.00%1,000.00%1,500.00%2,000.00%2,500.00%3,000.00%3,500.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
21.58%
2,937.37%
CXW
IRM

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CoreCivic, Inc.

Iron Mountain Incorporated

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CXW vs. IRM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) and Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CXW
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CXW, currently valued at 2.18, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.002.18
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CXW, currently valued at 3.13, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.13
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CXW, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.37
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CXW, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.99
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CXW, currently valued at 16.40, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0016.40
IRM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IRM, currently valued at 2.08, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.002.08
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for IRM, currently valued at 2.90, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.90
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for IRM, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.35
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for IRM, currently valued at 4.52, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.004.52
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for IRM, currently valued at 11.99, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0011.99

CXW vs. IRM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CXW Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which roughly equals the IRM Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of CXW and IRM.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
2.18
2.08
CXW
IRM

Dividends

CXW vs. IRM - Dividend Comparison

CXW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IRM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CXW
CoreCivic, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%13.44%7.59%9.65%7.47%8.34%8.15%5.61%26.82%
IRM
Iron Mountain Incorporated
3.29%3.63%4.96%4.73%8.39%7.69%7.32%5.93%6.17%7.07%6.00%4.39%

Drawdowns

CXW vs. IRM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CXW drawdown since its inception was -97.76%, which is greater than IRM's maximum drawdown of -55.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXW and IRM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-45.68%
-3.50%
CXW
IRM

Volatility

CXW vs. IRM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) is 5.86%, while Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) has a volatility of 6.25%. This indicates that CXW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
5.86%
6.25%
CXW
IRM

Financials

CXW vs. IRM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CoreCivic, Inc. and Iron Mountain Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items