CXW vs. IRM
Compare and contrast key facts about CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) and Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CXW or IRM.
Correlation
The correlation between CXW and IRM is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CXW vs. IRM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CXW:
0.83
IRM:
2.16
CXW:
1.75
IRM:
2.61
CXW:
1.25
IRM:
1.37
CXW:
0.79
IRM:
2.92
CXW:
3.33
IRM:
12.69
CXW:
13.89%
IRM:
4.64%
CXW:
55.64%
IRM:
27.25%
CXW:
-97.76%
IRM:
-55.71%
CXW:
-23.67%
IRM:
-17.45%
Fundamentals
CXW:
$2.36B
IRM:
$32.31B
CXW:
$0.68
IRM:
$0.36
CXW:
31.46
IRM:
305.81
CXW:
1.44
IRM:
1.08
CXW:
$1.97B
IRM:
$5.99B
CXW:
$383.19M
IRM:
$2.94B
CXW:
$301.17M
IRM:
$2.36B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CXW achieves a 43.50% return, which is significantly lower than IRM's 54.47% return. Over the past 10 years, CXW has underperformed IRM with an annualized return of -1.51%, while IRM has yielded a comparatively higher 17.00% annualized return.
CXW
43.50%
-2.89%
83.38%
42.91%
4.96%
-1.51%
IRM
54.47%
-9.05%
19.77%
56.55%
33.78%
17.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CXW vs. IRM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) and Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CXW vs. IRM - Dividend Comparison
CXW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IRM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CXW CoreCivic, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 13.44% | 7.59% | 9.65% | 7.47% | 8.34% | 8.15% | 5.61% | 26.82% |
IRM Iron Mountain Incorporated | 2.60% | 3.63% | 4.96% | 4.73% | 8.39% | 7.69% | 7.33% | 5.93% | 6.17% | 7.07% | 6.05% | 4.52% |
Drawdowns
CXW vs. IRM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CXW drawdown since its inception was -97.76%, which is greater than IRM's maximum drawdown of -55.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXW and IRM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CXW vs. IRM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) is 8.49%, while Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) has a volatility of 10.40%. This indicates that CXW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CXW vs. IRM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CoreCivic, Inc. and Iron Mountain Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities