PortfoliosLab logo
CXW vs. IRM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CXW and IRM is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CXW vs. IRM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) and Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CXW:

0.71

IRM:

0.84

Sortino Ratio

CXW:

1.66

IRM:

1.21

Omega Ratio

CXW:

1.23

IRM:

1.18

Calmar Ratio

CXW:

0.76

IRM:

0.71

Martin Ratio

CXW:

2.71

IRM:

1.58

Ulcer Index

CXW:

16.50%

IRM:

17.61%

Daily Std Dev

CXW:

57.55%

IRM:

33.11%

Max Drawdown

CXW:

-97.76%

IRM:

-55.71%

Current Drawdown

CXW:

-19.61%

IRM:

-21.76%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CXW:

$2.39B

IRM:

$28.86B

EPS

CXW:

$0.77

IRM:

$0.41

PE Ratio

CXW:

28.47

IRM:

238.54

PEG Ratio

CXW:

1.44

IRM:

1.08

PS Ratio

CXW:

1.23

IRM:

4.61

PB Ratio

CXW:

1.62

IRM:

1.52K

Total Revenue (TTM)

CXW:

$1.95B

IRM:

$6.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CXW:

$426.27M

IRM:

$3.29B

EBITDA (TTM)

CXW:

$305.84M

IRM:

$2.40B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CXW achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly higher than IRM's -5.23% return. Over the past 10 years, CXW has underperformed IRM with an annualized return of -0.59%, while IRM has yielded a comparatively higher 17.82% annualized return.


CXW

YTD

1.01%

1M

-3.00%

6M

-1.66%

1Y

40.77%

3Y*

19.50%

5Y*

12.79%

10Y*

-0.59%

IRM

YTD

-5.23%

1M

10.08%

6M

-18.93%

1Y

27.60%

3Y*

27.57%

5Y*

37.76%

10Y*

17.82%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CoreCivic, Inc.

Iron Mountain Incorporated

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CXW vs. IRM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CXW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CXW is 7878
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CXW is 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CXW is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CXW is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CXW is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CXW is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

IRM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IRM is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IRM is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IRM is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IRM is 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IRM is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IRM is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CXW vs. IRM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) and Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CXW Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is comparable to the IRM Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CXW and IRM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

CXW vs. IRM - Dividend Comparison

CXW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IRM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CXW
CoreCivic, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%13.44%7.59%9.65%7.47%8.34%8.15%5.61%
IRM
Iron Mountain Incorporated
2.90%3.34%3.63%4.97%4.73%8.40%7.69%7.33%5.93%6.17%7.07%6.05%

Drawdowns

CXW vs. IRM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CXW drawdown since its inception was -97.76%, which is greater than IRM's maximum drawdown of -55.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXW and IRM.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

CXW vs. IRM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) is 6.52%, while Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) has a volatility of 7.47%. This indicates that CXW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CXW vs. IRM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CoreCivic, Inc. and Iron Mountain Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B1.60B20212022202320242025
488.63M
1.59B
(CXW) Total Revenue
(IRM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CXW vs. IRM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CoreCivic, Inc. and Iron Mountain Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
23.3%
55.4%
(CXW) Gross Margin
(IRM) Gross Margin
CXW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CoreCivic, Inc. reported a gross profit of 113.89M and revenue of 488.63M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.3%.

IRM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Iron Mountain Incorporated reported a gross profit of 882.33M and revenue of 1.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.4%.

CXW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CoreCivic, Inc. reported an operating income of 47.36M and revenue of 488.63M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.7%.

IRM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Iron Mountain Incorporated reported an operating income of 254.29M and revenue of 1.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.0%.

CXW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CoreCivic, Inc. reported a net income of 25.11M and revenue of 488.63M, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.

IRM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Iron Mountain Incorporated reported a net income of 15.95M and revenue of 1.59B, resulting in a net margin of 1.0%.