PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CXW vs. AMZN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CXW vs. AMZN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) and Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CXW achieves a 55.15% return, which is significantly higher than AMZN's 0.85% return. Over the past 10 years, CXW has underperformed AMZN with an annualized return of 2.02%, while AMZN has yielded a comparatively higher 20.88% annualized return.


CXW

1D
2.60%
1M
37.91%
YTD
55.15%
6M
53.31%
1Y
44.70%
3Y*
46.40%
5Y*
21.41%
10Y*
2.02%

AMZN

1D
-4.75%
1M
-12.59%
YTD
0.85%
6M
1.91%
1Y
11.02%
3Y*
21.64%
5Y*
5.85%
10Y*
20.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CXW vs. AMZN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CXW
CoreCivic, Inc.
55.15%-12.10%49.62%25.69%15.95%52.21%-59.85%4.44%-13.99%-1.98%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
0.85%5.21%44.39%80.88%-49.62%2.38%76.26%23.03%28.43%55.96%

Correlation

The correlation between CXW and AMZN is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 1997

0.21

Fundamentals

EPS

CXW:

$1.60

AMZN:

$8.37

PE Ratio

CXW:

18.48

AMZN:

27.81

PEG Ratio

CXW:

0.46

AMZN:

0.67

PS Ratio

CXW:

1.02

AMZN:

3.40

Total Revenue (TTM)

CXW:

$2.34B

AMZN:

$742.78B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CXW:

$404.76M

AMZN:

$348.59B

EBITDA (TTM)

CXW:

$309.65M

AMZN:

$152.71B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CXW vs. AMZN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CXW
CXW Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
CXW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CXW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CXW Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
CXW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
CXW Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

AMZN
AMZN Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
AMZN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZN Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZN Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CXW vs. AMZN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) and Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CXWAMZNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.09

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

0.51

+1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.21

1.18

+2.03

CXW vs. AMZN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CXW Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is higher than the AMZN Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CXW and AMZN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CXW vs. AMZN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CXW drawdown since its inception was -98.54%, roughly equal to the maximum AMZN drawdown of -94.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXW and AMZN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CXWAMZNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.54%

-94.40%

-4.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.41%

-21.74%

-6.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.62%

-30.88%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.68%

-56.15%

+16.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.93%

-56.15%

-21.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-15.35%

+15.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.65%

-28.18%

-28.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.95%

9.37%

+4.58%

Volatility

CXW vs. AMZN - Volatility Comparison

CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) and Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) have volatilities of 10.50% and 10.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CXWAMZNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.50%

10.30%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.82%

21.84%

+7.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.03%

30.95%

+7.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.41%

35.68%

+7.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.35%

32.57%

+16.78%

Dividends

CXW vs. AMZN - Dividend Comparison

Neither CXW nor AMZN has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CXW
CoreCivic, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%13.44%7.59%9.65%7.47%8.34%8.15%

Financials

CXW vs. AMZN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CoreCivic, Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B20222023202420252026
614.73M
181.52B
(CXW) Total Revenue
(AMZN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CXW vs. AMZN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CoreCivic, Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%202220232024202520260
36.8%
Portfolio components
CXW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CoreCivic, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 614.73M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AMZN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a gross profit of 66.77B and revenue of 181.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

CXW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CoreCivic, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 614.73M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

AMZN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported an operating income of 23.85B and revenue of 181.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.1%.

CXW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CoreCivic, Inc. reported a net income of 37.92M and revenue of 614.73M, resulting in a net margin of 6.2%.

AMZN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a net income of 30.26B and revenue of 181.52B, resulting in a net margin of 16.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CXW and AMZN have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CXW has higher volatility (10.50%) compared to AMZN (10.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXW dropped -98.54% vs AMZN's -94.40%.

CXW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CXW and AMZN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer