PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARM vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ARM vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares (ARM) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARM achieves a 268.41% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's 19.48% return.


ARM

1D
-1.50%
1M
90.70%
YTD
268.41%
6M
195.07%
1Y
219.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDA

1D
-0.69%
1M
12.28%
YTD
19.48%
6M
22.81%
1Y
62.23%
3Y*
78.33%
5Y*
67.45%
10Y*
69.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARM vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ARM
Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares
268.41%-11.39%64.16%18.17%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
19.48%38.92%171.25%8.66%

Correlation

The correlation between ARM and NVDA is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023

0.50

The correlation between ARM and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ARM:

$430.09B

NVDA:

$5.43T

EPS

ARM:

$0.85

NVDA:

$6.53

PE Ratio

ARM:

475.66

NVDA:

34.15

PEG Ratio

ARM:

16.32

NVDA:

0.19

PS Ratio

ARM:

87.40

NVDA:

21.50

PB Ratio

ARM:

51.91

NVDA:

27.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

ARM:

$4.92B

NVDA:

$253.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ARM:

$4.66B

NVDA:

$187.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

ARM:

$1.37B

NVDA:

$192.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARM vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARM
ARM Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ARM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARM Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ARM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARM vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares (ARM) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARMNVDADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.39

1.84

+1.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.80

2.47

+1.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.30

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.39

3.21

+2.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.70

7.92

+2.77

ARM vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARM Sharpe Ratio is 3.39, which is higher than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARM and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARMNVDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.39

1.84

+1.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.30

0.63

+0.67

Drawdowns

ARM vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARM drawdown since its inception was -53.97%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARM and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARMNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.97%

-89.72%

+35.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.47%

-20.21%

-21.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-5.48%

+3.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.45%

-36.21%

+14.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.88%

8.20%

+12.68%

Volatility

ARM vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares (ARM) has a higher volatility of 33.78% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 11.79%. This indicates that ARM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARMNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.78%

11.79%

+21.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.31%

25.29%

+28.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.22%

34.03%

+31.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

75.41%

51.66%

+23.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.41%

49.80%

+25.61%

Dividends

ARM vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

ARM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARM
Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Financials

ARM vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00BOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
1.49B
81.62B
(ARM) Total Revenue
(NVDA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ARM vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares and NVIDIA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%October2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
93.1%
74.9%
Portfolio components
ARM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares reported a gross profit of 1.39B and revenue of 1.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 93.1%.

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

ARM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares reported an operating income of 440.00M and revenue of 1.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.5%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.

ARM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares reported a net income of 313.00M and revenue of 1.49B, resulting in a net margin of 21.0%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ARM and NVDA have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARM has higher volatility (33.78%) compared to NVDA (11.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARM dropped -53.97% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

ARM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.39 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARM and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer