CXW vs. GEO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CXW (CoreCivic, Inc.) and GEO (The GEO Group, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Real Estate sector — CXW in REIT - Specialty, GEO in REIT - Healthcare Facilities. Over the past 10 years, CXW returned -1.08%/yr vs 5.19%/yr for GEO. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

CXW vs. GEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) and The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CXW achieves a 13.61% return, which is significantly lower than GEO's 46.40% return. Over the past 10 years, CXW has underperformed GEO with an annualized return of -1.08%, while GEO has yielded a comparatively higher 5.19% annualized return.

CXW

• 1D: 1.69%
• 1M: 7.74%
• YTD: 13.61%
• 6M: 16.72%
• 1Y: -1.09%
• 3Y*: 34.56%
• 5Y*: 19.18%
• 10Y*: -1.08%

GEO

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: 27.02%
• YTD: 46.40%
• 6M: 38.01%
• 1Y: -12.37%
• 3Y*: 46.47%
• 5Y*: 31.91%
• 10Y*: 5.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CXW vs. GEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CXW CoreCivic, Inc.	13.61%	-12.10%	49.62%	25.69%	15.95%	52.21%	-59.85%	4.44%	-13.99%	-1.98%
GEO The GEO Group, Inc.	46.40%	-42.39%	158.36%	-1.10%	41.29%	-9.92%	-39.13%	-6.80%	-9.35%	5.08%

Correlation

The correlation between CXW and GEO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 1997	0.50

Over the past year, CXW and GEO have become more correlated (0.71) than their long-term average of 0.50, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

EPS CXW : $1.60 GEO : $1.83
PE Ratio CXW : 13.53 GEO : 12.92
PEG Ratio CXW : 0.33 GEO : 0.07
PS Ratio CXW : 0.75 GEO : 1.25
Total Revenue (TTM) CXW : $2.34B GEO : $2.63B
Gross Profit (TTM) CXW : $404.76M GEO : $1.59B
EBITDA (TTM) CXW : $309.65M GEO : $590.25M

Return for Risk

CXW vs. GEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CXW

CXW Risk / Return Rank: 37
CXW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
CXW Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
CXW Omega Ratio Rank: 35
CXW Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
CXW Martin Ratio Rank: 38

GEO

GEO Risk / Return Rank: 31
GEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
GEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
GEO Omega Ratio Rank: 30
GEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
GEO Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CXW vs. GEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) and The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CXW	GEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.03	-0.24	+0.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.22	0.00	+0.21
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.00	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.04	-0.24	+0.21
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.08	-0.39	+0.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CXW vs. GEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CXW Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is higher than the GEO Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CXW and GEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CXW	GEO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03	-0.24	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44	0.58	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.02	0.10	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.01	0.31	-0.29

Drawdowns

CXW vs. GEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CXW drawdown since its inception was -98.54%, which is greater than GEO's maximum drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXW and GEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CXW	GEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.54%	-86.59%	-11.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.41%	-50.82%	+22.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.62%	-62.49%	+29.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.68%	-62.49%	+22.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-77.93%	-77.82%	-0.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.03%	-33.24%	+7.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-56.73%	-38.93%	-17.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.06%	31.47%	-17.41%

Volatility

CXW vs. GEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) is 15.37%, while The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) has a volatility of 21.67%. This indicates that CXW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CXW	GEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.37%	21.67%	-6.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.12%	40.73%	-12.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.74%	51.56%	-14.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.05%	55.51%	-11.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.20%	51.77%	-2.57%

Dividends

CXW vs. GEO - Dividend Comparison

Neither CXW nor GEO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CXW CoreCivic, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	13.44%	7.59%	9.65%	7.47%	8.34%	8.15%
GEO The GEO Group, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.23%	20.09%	11.56%	9.54%	7.95%	7.24%	8.68%

Financials

CXW vs. GEO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CoreCivic, Inc. and The GEO Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CXW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CoreCivic, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 614.73M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

GEO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The GEO Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 177.79M and revenue of 707.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.

CXW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CoreCivic, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 614.73M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

GEO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The GEO Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 83.83M and revenue of 707.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.

CXW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CoreCivic, Inc. reported a net income of 37.92M and revenue of 614.73M, resulting in a net margin of 6.2%.

GEO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The GEO Group, Inc. reported a net income of 31.77M and revenue of 707.70M, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CXW and GEO in my portfolio?

CXW and GEO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CXW or GEO?

GEO has higher volatility (21.67%) compared to CXW (15.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXW dropped -98.54% vs GEO's -86.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CXW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.03 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.