CXW vs. GEO

In the year-to-date period, CXW achieves a 44.53% return, which is significantly lower than GEO's 158.54% return. Over the past 10 years, CXW has underperformed GEO with an annualized return of -1.48%, while GEO has yielded a comparatively higher 6.20% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) and The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CXW Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the GEO Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CXW and GEO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither CXW nor GEO has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum CXW drawdown since its inception was -97.76%, which is greater than GEO's maximum drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXW and GEO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) is 8.79%, while The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) has a volatility of 14.02%. This indicates that CXW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CoreCivic, Inc. and The GEO Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.