PortfoliosLab logo
CXW vs. GEO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CXW and GEO is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CXW vs. GEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) and The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%200.00%400.00%600.00%800.00%1,000.00%1,200.00%1,400.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
85.15%
1,015.28%
CXW
GEO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CXW:

0.84

GEO:

1.29

Sortino Ratio

CXW:

1.73

GEO:

2.46

Omega Ratio

CXW:

1.24

GEO:

1.28

Calmar Ratio

CXW:

0.82

GEO:

1.82

Martin Ratio

CXW:

2.94

GEO:

4.89

Ulcer Index

CXW:

16.38%

GEO:

17.67%

Daily Std Dev

CXW:

57.50%

GEO:

67.06%

Max Drawdown

CXW:

-97.76%

GEO:

-86.59%

Current Drawdown

CXW:

-17.27%

GEO:

-22.72%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CXW:

$2.51B

GEO:

$4.48B

EPS

CXW:

$0.62

GEO:

$0.22

PE Ratio

CXW:

37.03

GEO:

142.55

PEG Ratio

CXW:

1.44

GEO:

2.57

PS Ratio

CXW:

1.28

GEO:

1.85

PB Ratio

CXW:

1.68

GEO:

3.39

Total Revenue (TTM)

CXW:

$1.46B

GEO:

$1.82B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CXW:

$312.38M

GEO:

$895.36M

EBITDA (TTM)

CXW:

$228.00M

GEO:

$325.08M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CXW achieves a 3.96% return, which is significantly higher than GEO's -2.36% return. Over the past 10 years, CXW has underperformed GEO with an annualized return of -0.11%, while GEO has yielded a comparatively higher 6.69% annualized return.


CXW

YTD

3.96%

1M

15.90%

6M

28.56%

1Y

47.62%

5Y*

12.94%

10Y*

-0.11%

GEO

YTD

-2.36%

1M

-0.36%

6M

27.07%

1Y

100.44%

5Y*

21.39%

10Y*

6.69%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CXW vs. GEO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CXW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CXW is 8080
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CXW is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CXW is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CXW is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CXW is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CXW is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

GEO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GEO is 8989
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GEO is 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GEO is 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GEO is 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GEO is 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GEO is 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CXW vs. GEO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) and The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CXW Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the GEO Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CXW and GEO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.83
1.52
CXW
GEO

Dividends

CXW vs. GEO - Dividend Comparison

Neither CXW nor GEO has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CXW
CoreCivic, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%13.44%7.59%9.65%7.47%8.34%8.15%5.61%
GEO
The GEO Group, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.23%20.09%11.56%9.54%7.95%7.24%8.68%5.77%

Drawdowns

CXW vs. GEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CXW drawdown since its inception was -97.76%, which is greater than GEO's maximum drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXW and GEO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-17.27%
-22.72%
CXW
GEO

Volatility

CXW vs. GEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) is 9.71%, while The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) has a volatility of 19.03%. This indicates that CXW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%40.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
9.71%
19.03%
CXW
GEO

Financials

CXW vs. GEO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CoreCivic, Inc. and The GEO Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


450.00M500.00M550.00M600.00MAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
479.29M
607.72M
(CXW) Total Revenue
(GEO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CXW vs. GEO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CoreCivic, Inc. and The GEO Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%AprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
23.1%
21.2%
(CXW) Gross Margin
(GEO) Gross Margin
CXW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CoreCivic, Inc. reported a gross profit of 110.59M and revenue of 479.29M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.1%.

GEO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The GEO Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 128.58M and revenue of 607.72M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.2%.

CXW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CoreCivic, Inc. reported an operating income of 38.15M and revenue of 479.29M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.0%.

GEO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The GEO Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 67.90M and revenue of 607.72M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.

CXW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CoreCivic, Inc. reported a net income of 19.28M and revenue of 479.29M, resulting in a net margin of 4.0%.

GEO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The GEO Group, Inc. reported a net income of 15.49M and revenue of 607.72M, resulting in a net margin of 2.6%.