CXW vs. GEO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) and The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO).

Performance

CXW vs. GEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) and The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CXW vs. GEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CXW CoreCivic, Inc.	0.10%	-12.10%	49.62%	25.69%	15.95%	52.21%	-59.85%	4.44%	-13.99%	-1.98%
GEO The GEO Group, Inc.	7.51%	-42.39%	158.36%	-1.10%	41.29%	-9.92%	-39.13%	-6.80%	-9.35%	5.08%

Fundamentals

EPS CXW : $1.60 GEO : $1.83
PE Ratio CXW : 11.95 GEO : 9.49
PEG Ratio CXW : 0.29 GEO : 0.05
PS Ratio CXW : 0.63 GEO : 0.92
Total Revenue (TTM) CXW : $2.21B GEO : $2.63B
Gross Profit (TTM) CXW : $384.59M GEO : $1.59B
EBITDA (TTM) CXW : $293.19M GEO : $587.43M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CXW achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly lower than GEO's 7.51% return. Over the past 10 years, CXW has underperformed GEO with an annualized return of -1.68%, while GEO has yielded a comparatively higher 1.92% annualized return.

CXW

• 1D: 1.16%
• 1M: 5.17%
• YTD: 0.10%
• 6M: -6.91%
• 1Y: -7.14%
• 3Y*: 27.64%
• 5Y*: 16.70%
• 10Y*: -1.68%

GEO

• 1D: 3.09%
• 1M: 13.34%
• YTD: 7.51%
• 6M: -19.84%
• 1Y: -42.10%
• 3Y*: 29.99%
• 5Y*: 17.65%
• 10Y*: 1.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CXW vs. GEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CXW

CXW Risk / Return Rank: 31
CXW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
CXW Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
CXW Omega Ratio Rank: 28
CXW Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
CXW Martin Ratio Rank: 35

GEO

GEO Risk / Return Rank: 13
GEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
GEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
GEO Omega Ratio Rank: 10
GEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
GEO Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CXW vs. GEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) and The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CXW	GEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.21	-0.85	+0.64
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.05	-1.07	+1.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	0.86	+0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.19	-0.70	+0.51
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.37	-1.07	+0.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CXW vs. GEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CXW Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is higher than the GEO Sharpe Ratio of -0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CXW and GEO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CXW	GEO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.21	-0.85	+0.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37	0.32	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.03	0.04	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.00	0.28	-0.28

Correlation

The correlation between CXW and GEO is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CXW vs. GEO - Dividend Comparison

Neither CXW nor GEO has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CXW CoreCivic, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	13.44%	7.59%	9.65%	7.47%	8.34%	8.15%
GEO The GEO Group, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.23%	20.09%	11.56%	9.54%	7.95%	7.24%	8.68%

Drawdowns

CXW vs. GEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CXW drawdown since its inception was -98.54%, which is greater than GEO's maximum drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXW and GEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CXW	GEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.54%	-86.59%	-11.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.05%	-58.13%	+28.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.68%	-62.49%	+22.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-77.93%	-77.82%	-0.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-34.82%	-50.98%	+16.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-56.89%	-38.91%	-17.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.30%	38.09%	-22.79%

Volatility

CXW vs. GEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) is 10.88%, while The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) has a volatility of 13.54%. This indicates that CXW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CXW	GEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.88%	13.54%	-2.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.66%	37.65%	-9.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.66%	49.97%	-15.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.00%	55.84%	-10.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.96%	51.21%	-2.25%

Financials

CXW vs. GEO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CoreCivic, Inc. and The GEO Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CXW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CoreCivic, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 603.95M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

GEO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The GEO Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 177.79M and revenue of 707.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.

CXW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CoreCivic, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 603.95M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

GEO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The GEO Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 83.83M and revenue of 707.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.

CXW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CoreCivic, Inc. reported a net income of 26.54M and revenue of 603.95M, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.

GEO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The GEO Group, Inc. reported a net income of 31.77M and revenue of 707.70M, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.