PortfoliosLab logo
CXW vs. GEO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CXW and GEO is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CXW vs. GEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) and The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CXW:

0.71

GEO:

1.38

Sortino Ratio

CXW:

1.66

GEO:

2.61

Omega Ratio

CXW:

1.23

GEO:

1.30

Calmar Ratio

CXW:

0.76

GEO:

2.01

Martin Ratio

CXW:

2.71

GEO:

5.11

Ulcer Index

CXW:

16.50%

GEO:

18.64%

Daily Std Dev

CXW:

57.55%

GEO:

67.11%

Max Drawdown

CXW:

-97.76%

GEO:

-86.59%

Current Drawdown

CXW:

-19.61%

GEO:

-23.22%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CXW:

$2.39B

GEO:

$3.81B

EPS

CXW:

$0.77

GEO:

$0.22

PE Ratio

CXW:

28.47

GEO:

121.14

PEG Ratio

CXW:

1.44

GEO:

2.40

PS Ratio

CXW:

1.23

GEO:

1.57

PB Ratio

CXW:

1.62

GEO:

2.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

CXW:

$1.95B

GEO:

$2.42B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CXW:

$426.27M

GEO:

$2.42B

EBITDA (TTM)

CXW:

$305.84M

GEO:

$337.19M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CXW achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly higher than GEO's -3.00% return. Over the past 10 years, CXW has underperformed GEO with an annualized return of -0.59%, while GEO has yielded a comparatively higher 6.25% annualized return.


CXW

YTD

1.01%

1M

-3.00%

6M

-1.66%

1Y

40.77%

3Y*

19.50%

5Y*

12.79%

10Y*

-0.59%

GEO

YTD

-3.00%

1M

-13.24%

6M

-4.81%

1Y

91.94%

3Y*

56.28%

5Y*

20.15%

10Y*

6.25%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CoreCivic, Inc.

The GEO Group, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CXW vs. GEO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CXW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CXW is 7878
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CXW is 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CXW is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CXW is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CXW is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CXW is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

GEO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GEO is 8989
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GEO is 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GEO is 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GEO is 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GEO is 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GEO is 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CXW vs. GEO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) and The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CXW Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the GEO Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CXW and GEO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

CXW vs. GEO - Dividend Comparison

Neither CXW nor GEO has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CXW
CoreCivic, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%13.44%7.59%9.65%7.47%8.34%8.15%5.61%
GEO
The GEO Group, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.23%20.09%11.56%9.54%7.95%7.24%8.68%5.77%

Drawdowns

CXW vs. GEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CXW drawdown since its inception was -97.76%, which is greater than GEO's maximum drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXW and GEO.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

CXW vs. GEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) is 6.52%, while The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) has a volatility of 14.95%. This indicates that CXW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CXW vs. GEO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CoreCivic, Inc. and The GEO Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


450.00M500.00M550.00M600.00M20212022202320242025
488.63M
604.65M
(CXW) Total Revenue
(GEO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CXW vs. GEO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CoreCivic, Inc. and The GEO Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
23.3%
100.0%
(CXW) Gross Margin
(GEO) Gross Margin
CXW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CoreCivic, Inc. reported a gross profit of 113.89M and revenue of 488.63M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.3%.

GEO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The GEO Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 604.65M and revenue of 604.65M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

CXW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CoreCivic, Inc. reported an operating income of 47.36M and revenue of 488.63M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.7%.

GEO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The GEO Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 60.98M and revenue of 604.65M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.1%.

CXW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CoreCivic, Inc. reported a net income of 25.11M and revenue of 488.63M, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.

GEO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The GEO Group, Inc. reported a net income of 19.56M and revenue of 604.65M, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.