PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CXW vs. GEO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CXWGEO
YTD Return48.11%135.18%
1Y Return54.71%165.59%
3Y Return (Ann)23.69%38.75%
5Y Return (Ann)8.24%15.67%
10Y Return (Ann)-0.69%5.42%
Sharpe Ratio1.062.85
Sortino Ratio2.054.34
Omega Ratio1.291.52
Calmar Ratio1.002.92
Martin Ratio4.3011.85
Ulcer Index13.62%14.68%
Daily Std Dev55.49%61.09%
Max Drawdown-97.76%-86.59%
Current Drawdown-21.22%-3.81%

Fundamentals


CXWGEO
Market Cap$2.64B$3.50B
EPS$0.63$0.25
PE Ratio35.13100.20
PEG Ratio1.442.15
Total Revenue (TTM)$1.97B$1.82B
Gross Profit (TTM)$384.39M$409.22M
EBITDA (TTM)$280.65M$346.04M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between CXW and GEO is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CXW vs. GEO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CXW achieves a 48.11% return, which is significantly lower than GEO's 135.18% return. Over the past 10 years, CXW has underperformed GEO with an annualized return of -0.69%, while GEO has yielded a comparatively higher 5.42% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
44.43%
100.39%
CXW
GEO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CXW vs. GEO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) and The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CXW
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CXW, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.06
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CXW, currently valued at 2.05, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.05
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CXW, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.29
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CXW, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.00
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CXW, currently valued at 4.30, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.004.30
GEO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GEO, currently valued at 2.85, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.85
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GEO, currently valued at 4.34, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.34
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GEO, currently valued at 1.52, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.52
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GEO, currently valued at 2.92, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.92
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GEO, currently valued at 11.85, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0011.85

CXW vs. GEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CXW Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the GEO Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CXW and GEO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.06
2.85
CXW
GEO

Dividends

CXW vs. GEO - Dividend Comparison

Neither CXW nor GEO has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CXW
CoreCivic, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%13.44%7.59%9.65%7.47%8.34%8.15%5.61%26.82%
GEO
The GEO Group, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%3.23%20.09%11.56%9.54%7.95%7.24%8.68%5.77%6.36%

Drawdowns

CXW vs. GEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CXW drawdown since its inception was -97.76%, which is greater than GEO's maximum drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXW and GEO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-21.22%
-3.81%
CXW
GEO

Volatility

CXW vs. GEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) is 36.42%, while The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) has a volatility of 39.48%. This indicates that CXW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
36.42%
39.48%
CXW
GEO

Financials

CXW vs. GEO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CoreCivic, Inc. and The GEO Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items