PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CXW vs. MAC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CXWMAC
YTD Return48.11%29.24%
1Y Return54.71%75.09%
3Y Return (Ann)23.69%1.96%
5Y Return (Ann)8.24%-1.86%
10Y Return (Ann)-0.69%-6.56%
Sharpe Ratio1.062.40
Sortino Ratio2.052.95
Omega Ratio1.291.39
Calmar Ratio1.001.21
Martin Ratio4.3011.34
Ulcer Index13.62%8.61%
Daily Std Dev55.49%40.72%
Max Drawdown-97.76%-93.38%
Current Drawdown-21.22%-65.40%

Fundamentals


CXWMAC
Market Cap$2.64B$4.57B
EPS$0.63$0.36
PE Ratio35.1353.83
PEG Ratio1.44-485.00
Total Revenue (TTM)$1.97B$882.39M
Gross Profit (TTM)$384.39M$626.79M
EBITDA (TTM)$280.65M$360.92M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between CXW and MAC is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CXW vs. MAC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CXW achieves a 48.11% return, which is significantly higher than MAC's 29.24% return. Over the past 10 years, CXW has outperformed MAC with an annualized return of -0.69%, while MAC has yielded a comparatively lower -6.56% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
44.43%
23.92%
CXW
MAC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CXW vs. MAC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) and Macerich Company (MAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CXW
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CXW, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.06
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CXW, currently valued at 2.05, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.05
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CXW, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.29
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CXW, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.00
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CXW, currently valued at 4.30, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.004.30
MAC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MAC, currently valued at 2.40, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.40
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MAC, currently valued at 2.95, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.95
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MAC, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.39
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MAC, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.21
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MAC, currently valued at 11.34, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0011.34

CXW vs. MAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CXW Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the MAC Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CXW and MAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.06
2.40
CXW
MAC

Dividends

CXW vs. MAC - Dividend Comparison

CXW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CXW
CoreCivic, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%13.44%7.59%9.65%7.47%8.34%8.15%5.61%26.82%
MAC
Macerich Company
3.55%4.41%5.51%3.47%10.78%11.14%6.86%4.37%3.88%9.06%3.01%4.01%

Drawdowns

CXW vs. MAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CXW drawdown since its inception was -97.76%, roughly equal to the maximum MAC drawdown of -93.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXW and MAC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-21.22%
-65.40%
CXW
MAC

Volatility

CXW vs. MAC - Volatility Comparison

CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) has a higher volatility of 36.42% compared to Macerich Company (MAC) at 8.91%. This indicates that CXW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
36.42%
8.91%
CXW
MAC

Financials

CXW vs. MAC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CoreCivic, Inc. and Macerich Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items