CXW vs. MAC

In the year-to-date period, CXW achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly higher than MAC's -18.02% return. Over the past 10 years, CXW has outperformed MAC with an annualized return of -0.59%, while MAC has yielded a comparatively lower -9.92% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) and Macerich Company (MAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CXW Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is higher than the MAC Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CXW and MAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CXW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%.

The maximum CXW drawdown since its inception was -97.76%, roughly equal to the maximum MAC drawdown of -93.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXW and MAC.

The current volatility for CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) is 6.52%, while Macerich Company (MAC) has a volatility of 13.38%. This indicates that CXW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CoreCivic, Inc. and Macerich Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.