CXW vs. AI

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

CXW (CoreCivic, Inc.) and AI (C3.ai, Inc.) are both stocks. CXW operates in REIT - Specialty (Real Estate), while AI operates in Information Technology Services (Technology). Over the past 5 years, CXW returned 21.38%/yr vs -32.86%/yr for AI. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CXW vs. AI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) and C3.ai, Inc. (AI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CXW achieves a 53.74% return, which is significantly higher than AI's -35.09% return.

CXW

• 1D: -1.41%
• 1M: 38.65%
• YTD: 53.74%
• 6M: 53.82%
• 1Y: 46.17%
• 3Y*: 45.85%
• 5Y*: 21.38%
• 10Y*: 1.92%

AI

• 1D: -6.12%
• 1M: -8.76%
• YTD: -35.09%
• 6M: -37.68%
• 1Y: -62.99%
• 3Y*: -35.07%
• 5Y*: -32.86%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CXW vs. AI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CXW CoreCivic, Inc.	53.74%	-12.10%	49.62%	25.69%	15.95%	52.21%	-16.56%
AI C3.ai, Inc.	-35.09%	-60.85%	19.92%	156.57%	-64.19%	-77.48%	38.75%

Correlation

The correlation between CXW and AI is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020	0.18

Fundamentals

EPS CXW : $1.60 AI : -$3.37
PS Ratio CXW : 1.01 AI : 4.89
Total Revenue (TTM) CXW : $2.34B AI : $250.27M
Gross Profit (TTM) CXW : $404.76M AI : $77.38M
EBITDA (TTM) CXW : $309.65M AI : -$461.00M

Return for Risk

CXW vs. AI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CXW

CXW Risk / Return Rank: 74
CXW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
CXW Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
CXW Omega Ratio Rank: 74
CXW Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
CXW Martin Ratio Rank: 70

AI

AI Risk / Return Rank: 9
AI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
AI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
AI Omega Ratio Rank: 7
AI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
AI Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CXW vs. AI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) and C3.ai, Inc. (AI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CXW	AI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	-0.96	+2.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.76	-1.49	+3.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	0.81	+0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.63	-0.86	+2.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.32	-1.18	+4.50

CXW vs. AI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CXW Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is higher than the AI Sharpe Ratio of -0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CXW and AI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CXW vs. AI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CXW drawdown since its inception was -98.54%, roughly equal to the maximum AI drawdown of -95.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXW and AI.

Drawdown Indicators

	CXW	AI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.54%	-95.63%	-2.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.41%	-73.39%	+44.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.62%	-82.51%	+49.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.68%	-88.32%	+48.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-77.93%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.41%	-95.07%	+93.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-56.62%	-82.00%	+25.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.95%	53.25%	-39.30%

Volatility

CXW vs. AI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CoreCivic, Inc. (CXW) is 10.25%, while C3.ai, Inc. (AI) has a volatility of 19.18%. This indicates that CXW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CXW	AI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.25%	19.18%	-8.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.60%	48.33%	-18.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.98%	65.77%	-27.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.34%	77.72%	-34.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.33%	81.96%	-32.63%

Dividends

CXW vs. AI - Dividend Comparison

Neither CXW nor AI has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AI C3.ai, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CXW CoreCivic, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	13.44%	7.59%	9.65%	7.47%	8.34%	8.15%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CXW and AI in my portfolio?

CXW and AI have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CXW or AI?

AI has higher volatility (19.18%) compared to CXW (10.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXW dropped -98.54% vs AI's -95.63%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CXW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.