PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AI vs. ROBO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between AI and ROBO is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

AI vs. ROBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in C3.ai, Inc. (AI) and ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
16.09%
3.40%
AI
ROBO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AI:

0.44

ROBO:

0.27

Sortino Ratio

AI:

1.24

ROBO:

0.49

Omega Ratio

AI:

1.15

ROBO:

1.06

Calmar Ratio

AI:

0.33

ROBO:

0.17

Martin Ratio

AI:

1.09

ROBO:

0.88

Ulcer Index

AI:

26.62%

ROBO:

5.62%

Daily Std Dev

AI:

65.39%

ROBO:

18.32%

Max Drawdown

AI:

-94.22%

ROBO:

-43.65%

Current Drawdown

AI:

-81.79%

ROBO:

-19.70%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AI achieves a -6.16% return, which is significantly lower than ROBO's 2.19% return.


AI

YTD

-6.16%

1M

-24.62%

6M

14.41%

1Y

32.74%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

ROBO

YTD

2.19%

1M

0.77%

6M

2.72%

1Y

6.80%

5Y*

5.85%

10Y*

8.98%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AI vs. ROBO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AI is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AI is 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AI is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AI is 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AI is 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AI is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

ROBO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ROBO is 1414
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ROBO is 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ROBO is 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ROBO is 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ROBO is 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ROBO is 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AI vs. ROBO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for C3.ai, Inc. (AI) and ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AI, currently valued at 0.44, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.440.27
The chart of Sortino ratio for AI, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.240.49
The chart of Omega ratio for AI, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.151.06
The chart of Calmar ratio for AI, currently valued at 0.33, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.330.17
The chart of Martin ratio for AI, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.001.090.88
AI
ROBO

The current AI Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is higher than the ROBO Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AI and ROBO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.44
0.27
AI
ROBO

Dividends

AI vs. ROBO - Dividend Comparison

AI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ROBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
AI
C3.ai, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ROBO
ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF
0.54%0.55%0.05%0.00%0.18%0.20%0.37%0.37%0.02%0.19%0.28%0.28%

Drawdowns

AI vs. ROBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AI drawdown since its inception was -94.22%, which is greater than ROBO's maximum drawdown of -43.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AI and ROBO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-81.79%
-19.70%
AI
ROBO

Volatility

AI vs. ROBO - Volatility Comparison

C3.ai, Inc. (AI) has a higher volatility of 21.36% compared to ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) at 5.21%. This indicates that AI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
21.36%
5.21%
AI
ROBO
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab