CXSE vs. RBIL
CXSE (WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CXSE is a China Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CXSE returned 12.86% vs 4.11% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. CXSE charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.
Performance
CXSE vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CXSE achieves a -4.16% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.26% return.
CXSE
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -3.14%
- YTD
- -4.16%
- 6M
- -5.53%
- 1Y
- 12.86%
- 3Y*
- 10.02%
- 5Y*
- -9.30%
- 10Y*
- 7.01%
RBIL
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- YTD
- 2.26%
- 6M
- 2.29%
- 1Y
- 4.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CXSE vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CXSE WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund | -4.16% | 21.32% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 2.26% | 2.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between CXSE and RBIL is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025 | -0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CXSE vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank
CXSE
RBIL
CXSE vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CXSE | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 2.15 | -1.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.73 | 7.33 | -6.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.44 | 40.56 | -39.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CXSE vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CXSE drawdown since its inception was -70.01%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXSE and RBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CXSE | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.01% | -0.56% | -69.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.70% | -0.56% | -17.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.73% | -0.56% | -48.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.90% | -0.07% | -27.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.96% | 0.10% | +8.86% |
Volatility
CXSE vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) has a higher volatility of 7.43% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.36%. This indicates that CXSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CXSE | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.43% | 0.36% | +7.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.56% | 0.85% | +14.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.86% | 0.94% | +20.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.37% | 1.07% | +31.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.73% | 1.07% | +27.66% |
CXSE vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CXSE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
CXSE vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison
CXSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than RBIL's 4.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CXSE WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund | 2.09% | 1.95% | 1.70% | 1.71% | 1.55% | 0.86% | 0.54% | 0.96% | 1.49% | 1.24% | 1.39% | 2.50% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.39% | 3.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CXSE and RBIL have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CXSE has higher volatility (7.43%) compared to RBIL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXSE dropped -70.01% vs RBIL's -0.56%.
On 1-year performance, CXSE leads with 12.86% vs 4.11% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CXSE has performed better with a 12.86% return vs 4.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for CXSE.
RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.39%, compared with 2.09% for CXSE.
CXSE is categorized as China Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. CXSE tracks WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for CXSE and 0.17% for RBIL.
RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.40 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CXSE and RBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer