CXSE vs. MCHS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CXSE (WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund) and MCHS (Matthews China Discovery Active ETF) are both China Equities funds. CXSE is passively managed, while MCHS is actively managed. Over the past year, CXSE returned 24.36% vs 74.61% for MCHS. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CXSE charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for MCHS.

Performance

CXSE vs. MCHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) and Matthews China Discovery Active ETF (MCHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CXSE achieves a 0.93% return, which is significantly lower than MCHS's 44.10% return.

CXSE

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: 0.71%
• YTD: 0.93%
• 6M: 0.61%
• 1Y: 24.36%
• 3Y*: 10.95%
• 5Y*: -8.07%
• 10Y*: 7.43%

MCHS

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 8.54%
• YTD: 44.10%
• 6M: 45.75%
• 1Y: 74.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CXSE vs. MCHS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CXSE WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund	0.93%	37.00%	15.57%
MCHS Matthews China Discovery Active ETF	44.10%	31.19%	6.53%

Correlation

The correlation between CXSE and MCHS is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024	0.81

The correlation between CXSE and MCHS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

CXSE vs. MCHS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CXSE	MCHS
Consumer Cyclical	26.2%	12.5%
Technology	22.6%	31.5%
Industrials	16.6%	32.9%
Communication Services	10.1%	1.2%
Healthcare	8.8%	4.4%
Financial Services	6.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.9%	0.8%
Basic Materials	3.4%	9.0%
Real Estate	0.9%	3.7%
Energy	0.4%	3.9%
Utilities	0.3%	2.1%

Return for Risk

CXSE vs. MCHS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CXSE

CXSE Risk / Return Rank: 28
CXSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
CXSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
CXSE Omega Ratio Rank: 30
CXSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
CXSE Martin Ratio Rank: 22

MCHS

MCHS Risk / Return Rank: 90
MCHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
MCHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
MCHS Omega Ratio Rank: 88
MCHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
MCHS Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CXSE vs. MCHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) and Matthews China Discovery Active ETF (MCHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CXSE	MCHS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.14	3.30	-2.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.67	4.11	-2.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.55	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.38	6.17	-4.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.90	18.64	-15.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CXSE vs. MCHS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CXSE Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the MCHS Sharpe Ratio of 3.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CXSE and MCHS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CXSE	MCHS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.14	3.30	-2.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.25	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.26	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	1.21	-1.02

Drawdowns

CXSE vs. MCHS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CXSE drawdown since its inception was -70.01%, which is greater than MCHS's maximum drawdown of -23.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXSE and MCHS.

Drawdown Indicators

	CXSE	MCHS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.01%	-23.75%	-46.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.70%	-12.15%	-5.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.12%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.47%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-70.01%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-46.01%	-3.27%	-42.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.83%	-7.61%	-20.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.42%	4.02%	+4.40%

Volatility

CXSE vs. MCHS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) is 7.29%, while Matthews China Discovery Active ETF (MCHS) has a volatility of 10.80%. This indicates that CXSE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CXSE	MCHS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.29%	10.80%	-3.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.54%	18.20%	-3.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.39%	22.74%	-1.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.30%	28.24%	+4.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.70%	28.24%	+0.46%

CXSE vs. MCHS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CXSE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than MCHS's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

CXSE vs. MCHS - Dividend Comparison

CXSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, less than MCHS's 2.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CXSE WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund	1.99%	1.95%	1.70%	1.71%	1.55%	0.86%	0.54%	0.96%	1.49%	1.24%	1.39%	2.50%
MCHS Matthews China Discovery Active ETF	2.47%	3.56%	5.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CXSE and MCHS in my portfolio?

CXSE and MCHS have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CXSE or MCHS?

MCHS has higher volatility (10.80%) compared to CXSE (7.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXSE dropped -70.01% vs MCHS's -23.75%.

Which ETF is better, CXSE or MCHS?

On 1-year performance, MCHS leads with 74.61% vs 24.36% for CXSE. On fees, CXSE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, CXSE has been the lower-risk option at 7.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CXSE or MCHS?

Over the 1-year period, MCHS has performed better with a 74.61% return vs 24.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CXSE or MCHS?

CXSE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for MCHS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CXSE or MCHS?

MCHS has the higher dividend yield at 2.47%, compared with 1.99% for CXSE.

What is the main difference between CXSE and MCHS?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Matthews. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for CXSE and 0.89% for MCHS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MCHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.