PortfoliosLab logo
MCHS vs. MCH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MCHS and MCH is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

MCHS vs. MCH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews China Discovery Active ETF (MCHS) and Matthews China Active ETF (MCH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

MCHS:

17.27%

MCH:

23.04%

Max Drawdown

MCHS:

-1.83%

MCH:

-1.71%

Current Drawdown

MCHS:

-1.64%

MCH:

-1.06%

Returns By Period


MCHS

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

MCH

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MCHS vs. MCH - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCHS has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than MCH's 0.79% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MCHS vs. MCH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCHS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MCHS is 3131
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MCHS is 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MCHS is 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MCHS is 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MCHS is 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MCHS is 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

MCH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MCH is 4848
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MCH is 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MCH is 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MCH is 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MCH is 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MCH is 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MCHS vs. MCH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews China Discovery Active ETF (MCHS) and Matthews China Active ETF (MCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

MCHS vs. MCH - Dividend Comparison

MCHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.14%, more than MCH's 1.25% yield.


TTM20242023
MCHS
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
5.14%0.00%0.00%
MCH
Matthews China Active ETF
1.25%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MCHS vs. MCH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCHS drawdown since its inception was -1.83%, which is greater than MCH's maximum drawdown of -1.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCHS and MCH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

MCHS vs. MCH - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...