PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MCHS vs. MCH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MCHS and MCH is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

MCHS vs. MCH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews China Discovery Active ETF (MCHS) and Matthews China Active ETF (MCH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
26.56%
32.92%
MCHS
MCH

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MCHS:

0.68

MCH:

1.07

Sortino Ratio

MCHS:

1.16

MCH:

1.75

Omega Ratio

MCHS:

1.16

MCH:

1.24

Calmar Ratio

MCHS:

0.96

MCH:

1.01

Martin Ratio

MCHS:

1.58

MCH:

2.41

Ulcer Index

MCHS:

12.84%

MCH:

15.32%

Daily Std Dev

MCHS:

29.96%

MCH:

34.49%

Max Drawdown

MCHS:

-21.17%

MCH:

-40.53%

Current Drawdown

MCHS:

-10.47%

MCH:

-14.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCHS achieves a 9.21% return, which is significantly lower than MCH's 11.68% return.


MCHS

YTD

9.21%

1M

7.10%

6M

26.56%

1Y

20.24%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

MCH

YTD

11.68%

1M

11.82%

6M

32.92%

1Y

35.35%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MCHS vs. MCH - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCHS has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than MCH's 0.79% expense ratio.


MCHS
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
Expense ratio chart for MCHS: current value at 0.89% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.89%
Expense ratio chart for MCH: current value at 0.79% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.79%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MCHS vs. MCH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCHS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MCHS is 2929
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MCHS is 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MCHS is 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MCHS is 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MCHS is 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MCHS is 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

MCH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MCH is 4343
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MCH is 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MCH is 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MCH is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MCH is 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MCH is 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MCHS vs. MCH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews China Discovery Active ETF (MCHS) and Matthews China Active ETF (MCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MCHS, currently valued at 0.68, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.681.07
The chart of Sortino ratio for MCHS, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.161.75
The chart of Omega ratio for MCHS, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.161.24
The chart of Calmar ratio for MCHS, currently valued at 0.96, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.961.28
The chart of Martin ratio for MCHS, currently valued at 1.58, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.001.582.41
MCHS
MCH

The current MCHS Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the MCH Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCHS and MCH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.200.400.600.801.001.20Thu 16Sat 18Mon 20Wed 22Fri 24Jan 26Tue 28Thu 30FebruaryMon 03Wed 05Fri 07Feb 09Tue 11Thu 13Sat 15Mon 17Wed 19
0.68
1.07
MCHS
MCH

Dividends

MCHS vs. MCH - Dividend Comparison

MCHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, more than MCH's 1.18% yield.


TTM20242023
MCHS
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
5.02%5.48%0.00%
MCH
Matthews China Active ETF
1.18%1.32%1.62%

Drawdowns

MCHS vs. MCH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCHS drawdown since its inception was -21.17%, smaller than the maximum MCH drawdown of -40.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCHS and MCH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-10.47%
-14.96%
MCHS
MCH

Volatility

MCHS vs. MCH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Matthews China Discovery Active ETF (MCHS) is 5.74%, while Matthews China Active ETF (MCH) has a volatility of 6.54%. This indicates that MCHS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
5.74%
6.54%
MCHS
MCH
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab