MCHS vs. FLCH
Compare and contrast key facts about Matthews China Discovery Active ETF (MCHS) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH).
MCHS and FLCH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MCHS is an actively managed fund by Matthews. It was launched on Jan 10, 2024. FLCH is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MCHS or FLCH.
Correlation
The correlation between MCHS and FLCH is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
MCHS vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
MCHS:
17.27%
FLCH:
25.48%
MCHS:
-1.83%
FLCH:
-2.41%
MCHS:
-1.64%
FLCH:
-1.42%
Returns By Period
MCHS
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
FLCH
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MCHS vs. FLCH - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCHS has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MCHS vs. FLCH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
MCHS
FLCH
MCHS vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews China Discovery Active ETF (MCHS) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
MCHS vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison
MCHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.14%, more than FLCH's 2.54% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCHS Matthews China Discovery Active ETF | 5.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | 2.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MCHS vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCHS drawdown since its inception was -1.83%, smaller than the maximum FLCH drawdown of -2.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCHS and FLCH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
MCHS vs. FLCH - Volatility Comparison
Loading data...