CXSE vs. KLIP
CXSE (WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund) and KLIP (KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both China Equities funds. CXSE is passively managed, while KLIP is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CXSE returned 6.76%/yr vs 6.46%/yr for KLIP. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CXSE charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for KLIP.
Performance
CXSE vs. KLIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CXSE achieves a -2.80% return, which is significantly higher than KLIP's -6.43% return.
CXSE
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- 3.19%
- 6M
- -4.37%
- YTD
- -2.80%
- 1Y
- 6.79%
- 3Y*
- 6.76%
- 5Y*
- -6.30%
- 10Y*
- 6.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.89%
KLIP
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 7.28%
- 6M
- -9.42%
- YTD
- -6.43%
- 1Y
- -3.80%
- 3Y*
- 6.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.63%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.94M | $1.25M | $1.09M | |
| $648.17K | $565.25K | $989.65K |
CXSE vs. KLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CXSE WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund | -2.80% | 37.00% | 8.56% | -26.97% |
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF | -6.43% | 16.92% | 3.37% | 11.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between CXSE and KLIP is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2023 | 0.82 |
The correlation between CXSE and KLIP shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CXSE vs. KLIP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CXSE
KLIP
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
-
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
CXSE
KLIP
Consumer Cyclical
CXSE
KLIP
Industrials
CXSE
KLIP
-
Communication Services
CXSE
KLIP
Healthcare
CXSE
KLIP
Financial Services
CXSE
KLIP
Consumer Defensive
CXSE
KLIP
Basic Materials
CXSE
KLIP
-
Real Estate
CXSE
KLIP
Energy
CXSE
KLIP
-
Utilities
CXSE
KLIP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CXSE vs. KLIP — Risk / Return Rank
CXSE
KLIP
CXSE vs. KLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CXSE | KLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.97 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.39 | -0.18 | +0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.67 | -0.41 | +1.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CXSE vs. KLIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CXSE drawdown since its inception was -70.01%, which is greater than KLIP's maximum drawdown of -21.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXSE and KLIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CXSE | KLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.01% | -21.48% | -48.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.70% | -21.48% | +3.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.83% | -21.48% | -8.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.00% | -11.80% | -36.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.07% | -4.34% | -23.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.22% | 9.25% | +0.97% |
Volatility
CXSE vs. KLIP - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) has a higher volatility of 7.12% compared to KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) at 2.03%. This indicates that CXSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CXSE | KLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.12% | 2.03% | +5.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.20% | 13.00% | +3.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.58% | 16.57% | +6.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.02% | 17.97% | +14.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.80% | 17.97% | +10.83% |
CXSE vs. KLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
CXSE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than KLIP's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
CXSE vs. KLIP - Dividend Comparison
CXSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than KLIP's 27.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CXSE WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund | 1.49% | 1.95% | 1.70% | 1.71% | 1.55% | 0.86% | 0.54% | 0.96% | 1.49% | 1.24% | 1.39% | 2.50% |
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF | 27.43% | 25.14% | 54.26% | 61.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CXSE and KLIP have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CXSE has higher volatility (7.12%) compared to KLIP (2.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXSE dropped -70.01% vs KLIP's -21.48%.
On 3-year performance, CXSE leads with 6.76% vs 6.46% for KLIP. On fees, CXSE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, KLIP has been the lower-risk option at 2.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CXSE has performed better with a 6.76% return vs 6.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CXSE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for KLIP.
KLIP has the higher dividend yield at 27.43%, compared with 1.49% for CXSE.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for CXSE and 0.95% for KLIP.
CXSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.30 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CXSE and KLIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer