CXSE vs. ISVBF
CXSE (WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund) and ISVBF (iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF) are both China Equities funds - CXSE tracks the WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index while ISVBF tracks the MSCI China A Inclusion Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CXSE returned -6.30%/yr vs -2.48%/yr for ISVBF. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CXSE charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for ISVBF.
Performance
CXSE vs. ISVBF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CXSE achieves a -2.80% return, which is significantly higher than ISVBF's -6.75% return.
CXSE
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- 3.19%
- 6M
- -4.37%
- YTD
- -2.80%
- 1Y
- 6.79%
- 3Y*
- 6.76%
- 5Y*
- -6.30%
- 10Y*
- 6.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.89%
ISVBF
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 9.06%
- 6M
- -8.63%
- YTD
- -6.75%
- 1Y
- -0.99%
- 3Y*
- 8.45%
- 5Y*
- -2.48%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -4.43%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.94M | $1.25M | $1.09M | |
| $147.49K | $255.95K | $315.23K |
CXSE vs. ISVBF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CXSE WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund | -2.80% | 37.00% | 8.56% | -18.02% | -29.32% | -22.83% |
ISVBF iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF | -6.75% | 30.64% | 18.96% | -9.28% | -23.01% | -22.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between CXSE and ISVBF is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2021 | 0.34 |
Over the past year, CXSE and ISVBF have become more correlated (0.62) than their long-term average of 0.34, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CXSE vs. ISVBF — Risk / Return Rank
CXSE
ISVBF
CXSE vs. ISVBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) and iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (ISVBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CXSE | ISVBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.02 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.39 | -0.04 | +0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.67 | -0.09 | +0.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CXSE vs. ISVBF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CXSE drawdown since its inception was -70.01%, which is greater than ISVBF's maximum drawdown of -53.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXSE and ISVBF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CXSE | ISVBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.01% | -53.78% | -16.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.70% | -24.14% | +6.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.83% | -24.14% | -5.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.68% | -46.06% | -12.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.00% | -24.42% | -23.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.07% | -32.57% | +4.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.22% | 11.23% | -1.01% |
Volatility
CXSE vs. ISVBF - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) has a higher volatility of 7.12% compared to iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (ISVBF) at 6.46%. This indicates that CXSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISVBF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CXSE | ISVBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.12% | 6.46% | +0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.20% | 26.45% | -10.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.58% | 31.60% | -9.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.02% | 30.08% | +1.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.80% | 30.06% | -1.26% |
CXSE vs. ISVBF - Expense Ratio Comparison
CXSE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than ISVBF's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
CXSE vs. ISVBF - Dividend Comparison
CXSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, while ISVBF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CXSE WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund | 1.49% | 1.95% | 1.70% | 1.71% | 1.55% | 0.86% | 0.54% | 0.96% | 1.49% | 1.24% | 1.39% | 2.50% |
ISVBF iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CXSE and ISVBF have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CXSE has higher volatility (7.12%) compared to ISVBF (6.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXSE dropped -70.01% vs ISVBF's -53.78%.
On 5-year performance, ISVBF leads with -2.48% vs -6.30% for CXSE. On fees, CXSE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, ISVBF has been the lower-risk option at 6.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ISVBF has performed better with a -2.48% return vs -6.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CXSE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ISVBF.
CXSE has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.00% for ISVBF.
CXSE tracks WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index, while ISVBF tracks MSCI China A Inclusion Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for CXSE and 0.40% for ISVBF.
CXSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.30 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CXSE and ISVBF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer