PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CXSE vs. GXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CXSE vs. GXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) and SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CXSE achieves a 0.93% return, which is significantly higher than GXC's -3.93% return. Over the past 10 years, CXSE has outperformed GXC with an annualized return of 7.43%, while GXC has yielded a comparatively lower 5.25% annualized return.


CXSE

1D
-1.05%
1M
0.71%
YTD
0.93%
6M
0.61%
1Y
24.36%
3Y*
10.95%
5Y*
-8.07%
10Y*
7.43%

GXC

1D
-2.27%
1M
-2.82%
YTD
-3.93%
6M
-5.13%
1Y
12.26%
3Y*
10.65%
5Y*
-4.55%
10Y*
5.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CXSE vs. GXC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
0.93%37.00%8.56%-18.02%-29.32%-23.67%59.39%37.96%-28.55%81.50%
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
-3.93%30.84%14.60%-9.93%-22.12%-19.70%28.31%23.07%-19.39%51.66%

Correlation

The correlation between CXSE and GXC is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2012

0.88

The correlation between CXSE and GXC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

CXSE vs. GXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CXSE
GXC

Consumer Cyclical

26.2%
22.9%

Technology

22.6%
11.9%

Industrials

16.6%
9.1%

Communication Services

10.1%
14.3%

Healthcare

8.8%
6.7%

Financial Services

6.2%
17.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
3.7%

Basic Materials

3.4%
7.0%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.9%

Energy

0.4%
3.5%

Utilities

0.3%
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

CXSE
26.2%
GXC
22.9%

Technology

CXSE
22.6%
GXC
11.9%

Industrials

CXSE
16.6%
GXC
9.1%

Communication Services

CXSE
10.1%
GXC
14.3%

Healthcare

CXSE
8.8%
GXC
6.7%

Financial Services

CXSE
6.2%
GXC
17.1%

Consumer Defensive

CXSE
3.9%
GXC
3.7%

Basic Materials

CXSE
3.4%
GXC
7.0%

Real Estate

CXSE
0.9%
GXC
1.9%

Energy

CXSE
0.4%
GXC
3.5%

Utilities

CXSE
0.3%
GXC
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CXSE vs. GXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CXSE
CXSE Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
CXSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CXSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
CXSE Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
CXSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
CXSE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

GXC
GXC Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
GXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXC Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
GXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXC Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CXSE vs. GXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) and SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CXSEGXCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.13

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

0.90

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.90

2.02

+0.88

CXSE vs. GXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CXSE Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is higher than the GXC Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CXSE and GXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CXSEGXCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

0.65

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.25

-0.16

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.20

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.16

+0.03

Drawdowns

CXSE vs. GXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CXSE drawdown since its inception was -70.01%, roughly equal to the maximum GXC drawdown of -71.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXSE and GXC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CXSEGXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.01%

-71.96%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.70%

-13.73%

-3.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.12%

-25.54%

-6.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.47%

-53.99%

-10.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.01%

-60.23%

-9.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.01%

-32.10%

-13.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.83%

-28.82%

+0.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.42%

6.09%

+2.33%

Volatility

CXSE vs. GXC - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) has a higher volatility of 7.29% compared to SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) at 6.64%. This indicates that CXSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CXSEGXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.29%

6.64%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.54%

13.59%

+0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.39%

18.88%

+2.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.30%

28.97%

+3.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.70%

26.09%

+2.61%

CXSE vs. GXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CXSE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than GXC's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

CXSE vs. GXC - Dividend Comparison

CXSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, less than GXC's 2.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
1.99%1.95%1.70%1.71%1.55%0.86%0.54%0.96%1.49%1.24%1.39%2.50%
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
2.50%2.40%2.81%3.70%2.67%1.35%1.04%1.60%2.03%1.84%2.05%2.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, CXSE and GXC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CXSE has higher volatility (7.29%) compared to GXC (6.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXSE dropped -70.01% vs GXC's -71.96%.

On 10-year performance, CXSE leads with 7.43% vs 5.25% for GXC. On fees, CXSE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, GXC has been the lower-risk option at 6.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CXSE has performed better with a 7.43% return vs 5.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CXSE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for GXC.

GXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.50%, compared with 1.99% for CXSE.

CXSE tracks WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index, while GXC tracks S&P China BMI Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for CXSE and 0.59% for GXC.

CXSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CXSE and GXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer