CXSE vs. GXC
CXSE (WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund) and GXC (SPDR S&P China ETF) are both China Equities funds - CXSE tracks the WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index while GXC tracks the S&P China BMI Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CXSE returned 7.43%/yr vs 5.25%/yr for GXC. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CXSE charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for GXC.
Performance
CXSE vs. GXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CXSE achieves a 0.93% return, which is significantly higher than GXC's -3.93% return. Over the past 10 years, CXSE has outperformed GXC with an annualized return of 7.43%, while GXC has yielded a comparatively lower 5.25% annualized return.
CXSE
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 0.61%
- 1Y
- 24.36%
- 3Y*
- 10.95%
- 5Y*
- -8.07%
- 10Y*
- 7.43%
GXC
- 1D
- -2.27%
- 1M
- -2.82%
- YTD
- -3.93%
- 6M
- -5.13%
- 1Y
- 12.26%
- 3Y*
- 10.65%
- 5Y*
- -4.55%
- 10Y*
- 5.25%
CXSE vs. GXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CXSE WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund | 0.93% | 37.00% | 8.56% | -18.02% | -29.32% | -23.67% | 59.39% | 37.96% | -28.55% | 81.50% |
GXC SPDR S&P China ETF | -3.93% | 30.84% | 14.60% | -9.93% | -22.12% | -19.70% | 28.31% | 23.07% | -19.39% | 51.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between CXSE and GXC is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2012 | 0.88 |
The correlation between CXSE and GXC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
CXSE vs. GXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CXSE
GXC
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
CXSE
GXC
Technology
CXSE
GXC
Industrials
CXSE
GXC
Communication Services
CXSE
GXC
Healthcare
CXSE
GXC
Financial Services
CXSE
GXC
Consumer Defensive
CXSE
GXC
Basic Materials
CXSE
GXC
Real Estate
CXSE
GXC
Energy
CXSE
GXC
Utilities
CXSE
GXC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CXSE vs. GXC — Risk / Return Rank
CXSE
GXC
CXSE vs. GXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) and SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CXSE | GXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.13 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 0.90 | +0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.90 | 2.02 | +0.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CXSE | GXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 0.65 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.25 | -0.16 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.20 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.16 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
CXSE vs. GXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CXSE drawdown since its inception was -70.01%, roughly equal to the maximum GXC drawdown of -71.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXSE and GXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CXSE | GXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.01% | -71.96% | +1.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.70% | -13.73% | -3.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.12% | -25.54% | -6.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.47% | -53.99% | -10.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.01% | -60.23% | -9.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.01% | -32.10% | -13.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.83% | -28.82% | +0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.42% | 6.09% | +2.33% |
Volatility
CXSE vs. GXC - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) has a higher volatility of 7.29% compared to SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) at 6.64%. This indicates that CXSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CXSE | GXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.29% | 6.64% | +0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.54% | 13.59% | +0.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.39% | 18.88% | +2.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.30% | 28.97% | +3.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.70% | 26.09% | +2.61% |
CXSE vs. GXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
CXSE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than GXC's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
CXSE vs. GXC - Dividend Comparison
CXSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, less than GXC's 2.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CXSE WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund | 1.99% | 1.95% | 1.70% | 1.71% | 1.55% | 0.86% | 0.54% | 0.96% | 1.49% | 1.24% | 1.39% | 2.50% |
GXC SPDR S&P China ETF | 2.50% | 2.40% | 2.81% | 3.70% | 2.67% | 1.35% | 1.04% | 1.60% | 2.03% | 1.84% | 2.05% | 2.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, CXSE and GXC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
CXSE has higher volatility (7.29%) compared to GXC (6.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXSE dropped -70.01% vs GXC's -71.96%.
On 10-year performance, CXSE leads with 7.43% vs 5.25% for GXC. On fees, CXSE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, GXC has been the lower-risk option at 6.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CXSE has performed better with a 7.43% return vs 5.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CXSE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for GXC.
GXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.50%, compared with 1.99% for CXSE.
CXSE tracks WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index, while GXC tracks S&P China BMI Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for CXSE and 0.59% for GXC.
CXSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CXSE and GXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer