GXC vs. CQQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ).
GXC and CQQQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GXC is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P China BMI Index. It was launched on Mar 19, 2007. CQQQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the AlphaShares China Technology Index. It was launched on Dec 8, 2009. Both GXC and CQQQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GXC or CQQQ.
Performance
GXC vs. CQQQ - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXC achieves a 14.24% return, which is significantly higher than CQQQ's 12.80% return. Over the past 10 years, GXC has outperformed CQQQ with an annualized return of 1.98%, while CQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower 1.69% annualized return.
GXC
14.24%
-4.77%
1.09%
11.33%
-2.36%
1.98%
CQQQ
12.80%
-2.36%
9.56%
9.75%
-3.56%
1.69%
Key characteristics
| GXC | CQQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.28 | 0.18 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.63 | 0.57 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.08 | 1.07 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.14 | 0.09 |
| Martin Ratio | 0.83 | 0.50 |
| Ulcer Index | 10.28% | 13.73% |
| Daily Std Dev | 30.49% | 38.54% |
| Max Drawdown | -72.16% | -73.99% |
| Current Drawdown | -46.13% | -62.26% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GXC vs. CQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than CQQQ's 0.70% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between GXC and CQQQ is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GXC vs. CQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GXC vs. CQQQ - Dividend Comparison
GXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, more than CQQQ's 0.49% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXC SPDR S&P China ETF | 3.00% | 3.70% | 2.67% | 1.35% | 1.04% | 1.60% | 2.03% | 1.84% | 2.05% | 2.85% | 2.11% | 2.29% |
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF | 0.49% | 0.55% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 0.01% | 0.43% | 1.42% | 1.69% | 1.77% | 1.00% | 0.79% |
Drawdowns
GXC vs. CQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXC drawdown since its inception was -72.16%, roughly equal to the maximum CQQQ drawdown of -73.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXC and CQQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GXC vs. CQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) is 10.32%, while Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) has a volatility of 13.81%. This indicates that GXC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.