PortfoliosLab logo
GXC vs. CQQQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GXC and CQQQ is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.6

Performance

GXC vs. CQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%120.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
53.96%
90.39%
GXC
CQQQ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GXC:

0.76

CQQQ:

0.72

Sortino Ratio

GXC:

1.28

CQQQ:

1.33

Omega Ratio

GXC:

1.18

CQQQ:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

GXC:

0.48

CQQQ:

0.43

Martin Ratio

GXC:

1.86

CQQQ:

2.10

Ulcer Index

GXC:

13.95%

CQQQ:

14.54%

Daily Std Dev

GXC:

34.08%

CQQQ:

42.24%

Max Drawdown

GXC:

-72.16%

CQQQ:

-73.99%

Current Drawdown

GXC:

-41.64%

CQQQ:

-61.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXC achieves a 8.00% return, which is significantly higher than CQQQ's 5.43% return. Over the past 10 years, GXC has outperformed CQQQ with an annualized return of 0.20%, while CQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -0.07% annualized return.


GXC

YTD

8.00%

1M

-5.74%

6M

4.07%

1Y

23.69%

5Y*

-0.67%

10Y*

0.20%

CQQQ

YTD

5.43%

1M

-8.22%

6M

2.07%

1Y

27.05%

5Y*

-3.76%

10Y*

-0.07%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GXC vs. CQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than CQQQ's 0.70% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for CQQQ: current value is 0.70%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
CQQQ: 0.70%
Expense ratio chart for GXC: current value is 0.59%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
GXC: 0.59%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GXC vs. CQQQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GXC is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GXC is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GXC is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GXC is 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GXC is 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GXC is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

CQQQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CQQQ is 6666
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CQQQ is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CQQQ is 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CQQQ is 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CQQQ is 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CQQQ is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GXC vs. CQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for GXC, currently valued at 0.76, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
GXC: 0.76
CQQQ: 0.72
The chart of Sortino ratio for GXC, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
GXC: 1.28
CQQQ: 1.33
The chart of Omega ratio for GXC, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
GXC: 1.18
CQQQ: 1.16
The chart of Calmar ratio for GXC, currently valued at 0.48, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
GXC: 0.48
CQQQ: 0.43
The chart of Martin ratio for GXC, currently valued at 1.86, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
GXC: 1.86
CQQQ: 2.10

The current GXC Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is comparable to the CQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GXC and CQQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.76
0.72
GXC
CQQQ

Dividends

GXC vs. CQQQ - Dividend Comparison

GXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than CQQQ's 0.27% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
2.60%2.80%3.70%2.67%1.35%1.04%1.60%2.03%1.84%2.05%2.85%2.11%
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
0.27%0.28%0.55%0.08%0.00%0.47%0.01%0.43%1.42%1.69%1.77%1.00%

Drawdowns

GXC vs. CQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXC drawdown since its inception was -72.16%, roughly equal to the maximum CQQQ drawdown of -73.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXC and CQQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-41.64%
-61.25%
GXC
CQQQ

Volatility

GXC vs. CQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) is 14.22%, while Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) has a volatility of 16.88%. This indicates that GXC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
14.22%
16.88%
GXC
CQQQ