GXC vs. ASHR
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR).
GXC and ASHR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GXC is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P China BMI Index. It was launched on Mar 19, 2007. ASHR is a passively managed fund by DWS that tracks the performance of the CSI 300 Index. It was launched on Nov 6, 2013. Both GXC and ASHR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GXC or ASHR.
Correlation
The correlation between GXC and ASHR is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
GXC vs. ASHR - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GXC:
0.76
ASHR:
0.28
GXC:
1.28
ASHR:
0.63
GXC:
1.18
ASHR:
1.10
GXC:
0.48
ASHR:
0.19
GXC:
1.86
ASHR:
0.51
GXC:
13.95%
ASHR:
18.19%
GXC:
34.08%
ASHR:
33.30%
GXC:
-72.16%
ASHR:
-51.30%
GXC:
-41.64%
ASHR:
-40.91%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXC achieves a 8.00% return, which is significantly higher than ASHR's -2.04% return. Over the past 10 years, GXC has outperformed ASHR with an annualized return of 0.20%, while ASHR has yielded a comparatively lower -2.64% annualized return.
GXC
8.00%
-5.74%
4.07%
23.69%
-0.67%
0.20%
ASHR
-2.04%
-2.96%
-5.72%
8.62%
0.61%
-2.64%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GXC vs. ASHR - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than ASHR's 0.65% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GXC vs. ASHR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GXC
ASHR
GXC vs. ASHR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GXC vs. ASHR - Dividend Comparison
GXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than ASHR's 1.15% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXC SPDR S&P China ETF | 2.60% | 2.80% | 3.70% | 2.67% | 1.35% | 1.04% | 1.60% | 2.03% | 1.84% | 2.05% | 2.85% | 2.11% |
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund | 1.15% | 1.13% | 2.48% | 1.13% | 0.88% | 0.81% | 0.98% | 1.32% | 0.84% | 0.73% | 30.13% | 0.27% |
Drawdowns
GXC vs. ASHR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXC drawdown since its inception was -72.16%, which is greater than ASHR's maximum drawdown of -51.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXC and ASHR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GXC vs. ASHR - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) has a higher volatility of 14.22% compared to Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) at 10.44%. This indicates that GXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.