GXC vs. ASHR

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

GXC (SPDR S&P China ETF) and ASHR (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund) are both China Equities funds - GXC tracks the S&P China BMI Index while ASHR tracks the CSI 300 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GXC returned 5.49%/yr vs 5.39%/yr for ASHR. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GXC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ASHR.

Performance

GXC vs. ASHR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXC achieves a -1.69% return, which is significantly lower than ASHR's 10.26% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GXC having a 5.49% annualized return and ASHR not far behind at 5.39%.

GXC

• 1D: 2.60%
• 1M: -1.21%
• YTD: -1.69%
• 6M: -3.34%
• 1Y: 15.82%
• 3Y*: 11.50%
• 5Y*: -3.95%
• 10Y*: 5.49%

ASHR

• 1D: 2.09%
• 1M: 2.32%
• YTD: 10.26%
• 6M: 13.75%
• 1Y: 40.21%
• 3Y*: 12.12%
• 5Y*: -0.98%
• 10Y*: 5.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXC vs. ASHR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GXC SPDR S&P China ETF	-1.69%	30.84%	14.60%	-9.93%	-22.12%	-19.70%	28.31%	23.07%	-19.39%	51.66%
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund	10.26%	27.02%	11.95%	-12.52%	-27.52%	-1.57%	36.29%	36.50%	-28.45%	33.47%

Correlation

The correlation between GXC and ASHR is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2013	0.76

The correlation between GXC and ASHR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

GXC vs. ASHR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GXC	ASHR
Consumer Cyclical	22.9%	6.7%
Financial Services	17.1%	20.4%
Communication Services	14.3%	0.8%
Technology	11.9%	26.3%
Industrials	9.1%	16.7%
Basic Materials	7.0%	10.7%
Healthcare	6.7%	4.9%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	7.3%
Energy	3.5%	2.7%
Real Estate	1.9%	0.5%
Utilities	1.8%	3.0%

Return for Risk

GXC vs. ASHR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXC

GXC Risk / Return Rank: 24
GXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
GXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
GXC Omega Ratio Rank: 24
GXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
GXC Martin Ratio Rank: 22

ASHR

ASHR Risk / Return Rank: 77
ASHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
ASHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
ASHR Omega Ratio Rank: 70
ASHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
ASHR Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXC vs. ASHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GXC	ASHR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.85	2.40	-1.55
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.29	3.31	-2.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.42	-0.27
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.21	5.30	-4.08
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.75	16.41	-13.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GXC vs. ASHR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GXC Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the ASHR Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GXC and ASHR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GXC	ASHR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85	2.40	-1.55
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.14	-0.04	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21	0.22	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	0.23	-0.06

Drawdowns

GXC vs. ASHR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXC drawdown since its inception was -71.96%, which is greater than ASHR's maximum drawdown of -51.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXC and ASHR.

Drawdown Indicators

	GXC	ASHR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.96%	-51.30%	-20.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.73%	-7.69%	-6.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.54%	-33.12%	+7.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.99%	-45.76%	-8.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-60.23%	-51.30%	-8.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.53%	-15.52%	-15.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.82%	-29.19%	+0.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.05%	2.48%	+3.57%

Volatility

GXC vs. ASHR - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) has a higher volatility of 6.27% compared to Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) at 5.94%. This indicates that GXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GXC	ASHR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.27%	5.94%	+0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.42%	11.55%	+1.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.74%	16.84%	+1.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.97%	23.90%	+5.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.09%	24.06%	+2.03%

GXC vs. ASHR - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than ASHR's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

GXC vs. ASHR - Dividend Comparison

GXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, more than ASHR's 2.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund	2.09%	2.31%	1.13%	2.48%	1.13%	0.88%	0.81%	0.98%	1.32%	0.84%	0.73%	30.13%
GXC SPDR S&P China ETF	2.44%	2.40%	2.81%	3.70%	2.67%	1.35%	1.04%	1.60%	2.03%	1.84%	2.05%	2.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GXC and ASHR in my portfolio?

GXC and ASHR have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GXC or ASHR?

GXC has higher volatility (6.27%) compared to ASHR (5.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GXC dropped -71.96% vs ASHR's -51.30%.

Which ETF is better, GXC or ASHR?

On 10-year performance, GXC leads with 5.49% vs 5.39% for ASHR. On fees, GXC is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, ASHR has been the lower-risk option at 5.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GXC or ASHR?

Over the 10-year period, GXC has performed better with a 5.49% return vs 5.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GXC or ASHR?

GXC is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ASHR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GXC or ASHR?

GXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.44%, compared with 2.09% for ASHR.

What is the main difference between GXC and ASHR?

GXC tracks S&P China BMI Index, while ASHR tracks CSI 300 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GXC and 0.65% for ASHR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.