PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CXSE vs. DGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CXSE vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CXSE achieves a 0.93% return, which is significantly lower than DGRW's 9.10% return. Over the past 10 years, CXSE has underperformed DGRW with an annualized return of 7.43%, while DGRW has yielded a comparatively higher 14.15% annualized return.


CXSE

1D
-1.05%
1M
0.71%
YTD
0.93%
6M
0.61%
1Y
24.36%
3Y*
10.95%
5Y*
-8.07%
10Y*
7.43%

DGRW

1D
-0.83%
1M
4.06%
YTD
9.10%
6M
8.62%
1Y
20.79%
3Y*
16.64%
5Y*
12.17%
10Y*
14.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CXSE vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
0.93%37.00%8.56%-18.02%-29.32%-23.67%59.39%37.96%-28.55%81.50%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
9.10%12.17%16.98%18.66%-6.33%24.46%13.87%29.54%-5.38%26.90%

Correlation

The correlation between CXSE and DGRW is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2013

0.40

CXSE vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CXSE
DGRW

Consumer Cyclical

26.2%
7.1%

Technology

22.6%
32.1%

Industrials

16.6%
9.9%

Communication Services

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.8%
12.8%

Financial Services

6.2%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
6.7%

Basic Materials

3.4%
3.3%

Real Estate

0.9%

-

Energy

0.4%
5.0%

Utilities

0.3%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

CXSE
26.2%
DGRW
7.1%

Technology

CXSE
22.6%
DGRW
32.1%

Industrials

CXSE
16.6%
DGRW
9.9%

Communication Services

CXSE
10.1%
DGRW
10.1%

Healthcare

CXSE
8.8%
DGRW
12.8%

Financial Services

CXSE
6.2%
DGRW
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

CXSE
3.9%
DGRW
6.7%

Basic Materials

CXSE
3.4%
DGRW
3.3%

Real Estate

CXSE
0.9%
DGRW

-

Energy

CXSE
0.4%
DGRW
5.0%

Utilities

CXSE
0.3%
DGRW
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CXSE vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CXSE
CXSE Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
CXSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CXSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
CXSE Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
CXSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
CXSE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CXSE vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CXSEDGRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.39

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

2.52

-1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.90

11.03

-8.13

CXSE vs. DGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CXSE Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the DGRW Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CXSE and DGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CXSEDGRWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

2.12

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.25

0.88

-1.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.88

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.86

-0.66

Drawdowns

CXSE vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CXSE drawdown since its inception was -70.01%, which is greater than DGRW's maximum drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXSE and DGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CXSEDGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.01%

-32.04%

-37.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.70%

-8.30%

-9.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.12%

-16.21%

-15.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.47%

-17.27%

-47.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.01%

-32.04%

-37.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.01%

-0.83%

-45.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.83%

-3.01%

-24.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.42%

1.89%

+6.53%

Volatility

CXSE vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) has a higher volatility of 7.29% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) at 2.47%. This indicates that CXSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CXSEDGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.29%

2.47%

+4.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.54%

7.64%

+6.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.39%

9.88%

+11.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.30%

13.97%

+18.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.70%

16.21%

+12.49%

CXSE vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

CXSE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

CXSE vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison

CXSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than DGRW's 1.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
1.99%1.95%1.70%1.71%1.55%0.86%0.54%0.96%1.49%1.24%1.39%2.50%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.27%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


CXSE and DGRW have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CXSE has higher volatility (7.29%) compared to DGRW (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXSE dropped -70.01% vs DGRW's -32.04%.

On 10-year performance, DGRW leads with 14.15% vs 7.43% for CXSE. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 2.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 14.15% return vs 7.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for CXSE.

CXSE has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 1.27% for DGRW.

CXSE is categorized as China Equities, while DGRW is Dividend. CXSE tracks WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index, while DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for CXSE and 0.28% for DGRW.

DGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CXSE and DGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer